Tag: transcript

  • Episode 9 Transcript: Katherine Howe on the Salem Witch-Hunt

    Josh Hutchinson: [00:00:00] ” Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”

    Josh Hutchinson: Welcome to another episode of Thou Shalt Not Suffer: The Witch Trial podcast. I’m Josh Hutchinson.

    Sarah Jack: And I’m Sarah Jack.

    Josh Hutchinson: Today’s guest is the extraordinary author Katherine Howe. We’ll speak with her about the causes of the Salem Witch Hunt and about her new book on pirates. I’m excited to talk about Salem Witch Hunt again and really curious what her book is about.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah, it doesn’t matter what time of year.

    Josh Hutchinson: [00:01:00] It’s always Christmas for pirates.

    Sarah Jack: Just like Katherine’s other books, you are going to be delighted by the characters and the adventure. Fun getting to hear about it, and it’s gonna be hard to wait for the publishing.

    Josh Hutchinson: She has wild swashbuckling shenanigans. But first, on a more serious note, we talk Salem, Witch Trials, what caused them, what didn’t cause them, why Katherine Howe it gets fired up about certain topics.

    Sarah Jack: We get to a lot of layers.

    Josh Hutchinson: Peeling that onion.

    Sarah Jack: We just take Katherine right into the depths of the mechanics.

    Josh Hutchinson: We talk about the different spheres that Malcolm Gaskill spoke about that are nested in each other and how each of those [00:02:00] spheres contributed to the witch-hunt.

    Sarah Jack: We talk about what kind of perspective do we need to be using when we look back at the individuals that were in a different time in history.

    Josh Hutchinson: Oh yes, we do that, don’t we? Wow, this is gonna be one hell of an episode!

    Sarah Jack: Aren’t they all?

    Josh Hutchinson: Yes, but I have a good feeling about this one. It’s gonna be something special.

    Sarah Jack: It’s another dynamic conversation with a phenomenal author and researcher, and she does not hold back.

    Josh Hutchinson: She does not. The emotions come out. Be ready.

    Josh Hutchinson: I’m going to talk about the before the Salem Witch Trials, what the conditions were in Massachusetts Bay Colony and Salem Village and Andover.

    Josh Hutchinson: Colonies used to have charters, so they [00:03:00] were officially recognized by the English government to govern themselves without direct supervision from the Crown and Parliament. Massachusetts Bay lost its colonial charter in 1684, when King Charles II revoked it because they had been naughty boys. And when the witch hunt began in early 1692, they still didn’t have a charter, so they were in legal limbo.

    Josh Hutchinson: In addition, they were fighting King William’s War and still recovering from King Philip’s War, which was the costliest and bloodiest of the colonial wars, occurring between 1675 and 1678. In fact, the Massachusetts economy did not recover to pre-war levels [00:04:00] until the 1800s, after the Revolution.

    Josh Hutchinson: Economic hardship resulting from the wars and the collapse of land speculation were also contributed to by an influx of refugees from the frontier in Maine and New Hampshire, and Essex County, where Salem’s located, was especially impacted, due to its proximity to that frontier, being the northernmost county in Massachusetts. Many of the settlers of Salem had moved on to Maine and New Hampshire, only to be forced to return when their villages were burned to the ground.

    Josh Hutchinson: Beyond these issues, in Salem, the town had recently gone through a bit of a separation, [00:05:00] where Salem Village was allowed to begin its own church. In 1689, Salem Village hired the fourth in a series of unpopular ministers, and there were disputes over his contract, so there was a lot of tension in the area.

    Josh Hutchinson: There was also tension in Andover, which was the hardest hit by the witch trials, with some 45 individuals being accused. There, there was a dispute between two ministers, Francis Dane and Thomas Barnard. Francis Dane was an older gentleman with health issues, who was no longer performing full duties as minister. So they had brought in Thomas Barnard, a younger man to take over some of [00:06:00] his duties, but were still paying both men in 1692, leading to tensions within the community that may have fueled some of the allegations there.

    Josh Hutchinson: We’ll get into these issues further with Katherine Howe, and specifically we’ll be discussing Andover in a few weeks with author Richard Hite and get into more of whether the dispute over the ministers did or did not contribute to witch-hunt fever in that community.

    Sarah Jack: That was good, Josh. Thanks, Josh.

    Josh Hutchinson: You’re welcome. It was a fun one to do, and we’re going to dig into that stuff some more with our guest.

    Sarah Jack: I am excited to introduce author Katherine Howe, whose works include The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, Conversion, [00:07:00] The Daughters of Temperance Hobbs. She’s an editor of The Penguin Book of Witches and co-author of Vanderbilt.

    Josh Hutchinson: We’ve read that you’re actually connected to somebody accused, which is an interesting connection. So can you tell us about who it is that’s your ancestor?

    Katherine Howe: It’s a little bit of a funny story. So my last name is Howe, like, how are you? But with an “e” on the end. And one of the witches who was accused towards the beginning of the Salem panic and who was put to death was Elizabeth Howe. And she was from the same broad region that my family was from also. So it wasn’t a huge surprise when my aunt, back in the nineties, she was doing some genealogical research, and she figured out that that Elizabeth Howe is, I think it’s like my eighth great aunt. So it’s a lateral thing, rather than a direct thing. But at the time, she discovered that Elizabeth [00:08:00] Howe was related to us that way and also that Elizabeth Proctor was also a eighth or ninth great aunt, as well.

    Katherine Howe: Just not all that surprising given that those communities were pretty small, and there were lots of intermarriages between different family groups and things like that. So it was in the nineties when I first learned that and thought, of course, it being the nineties and me being a grunge kid, and I thought was like, “oh, that’s so badass. That’s so metal.” thought that was the greatest thing ever.

    Katherine Howe: I didn’t give it much thought beyond that, until I was actually living in that region of New England, because my family left New England in the 1930s. I grew up with this sense of it as like the motherland, but I didn’t actually grow up there myself. So I arrived in this region with this kind of funny twin consciousness of, oh, this is home, but I’m also a stranger here. And so it was being a stranger in this place that I felt this kinship that probably contributed somewhat to my getting started [00:09:00] writing fiction.

    Katherine Howe: My first book was The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, which was something I started working on when I was in graduate school at Boston University and just trying to think about the humanity of people living in this time and the, maybe a funny little detail. So one of the historians of witchcraft who I really admire the most is a woman named Mary Beth Norton, who wrote a book called In The Devil’s Snare, which anyone is interested in Salem has to know Professor Norton’s work, cause she’s just like the kind of detail that she can bring to it. And she writes in a novelistic sort of way. It’s just like the most gripping account of Salem ever. And Professor Norton has said that the more you work on witchcraft, the more superstitious you become. And I have to say that this is true. As evidenced by the anecdote I’m about to tell you.

    Katherine Howe: So my first book was The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane. It asked, “what if one of the Salem witches the real [00:10:00] thing?” But the real thing the way the colonists believe, which is to be not in that pointy hat fantasy, Harry Potter Sense.

    Katherine Howe: And I built that story around a woman named Deliverance Dane who’s a real person. And she was a minor person in the Salem Witch crisis. She was accused towards the end of the panic. She was not put to death. She really, like, was a footnote, I think, in the real history of Salem. And so I felt like it was okay to build a more fantastical story.

    Katherine Howe: Physick Book is a magical realist story, so I wanted room to have kind of a fantastical story around a real person. And so I picked her because of her obscurity, but also because of her name. Her name is so evocative of this particular moment in time of this like subculture that she was living in, Puritan New England, Deliverance Dane. Just amazing. So that is why I chose to write about her.

    Katherine Howe: That book [00:11:00] came out in 2009, and so several years later I was futsing about on a genealogy website because of course, for people who are interested in family history, life’s gotten a lot easier. Over the last couple of years, with the advent of digital humanities and so many more ways of doing research online. Like, when my aunt was doing research in the nineties, it was really hard to do, and now it’s actually much more accessible, which is a huge gift.

    Katherine Howe: So I’m messing about, point, click, point, click, and I come upon Nathaniel Dane, which is actually the name of a character in the book that I wrote, and I was like, “huh, that’s a weird coincidence. Who knew?” Point, click, point, click, point, click. Lo and behold, I learned that it turns out Deliverance Dane, the real one, is my eighth great-grandmother. And so she’s more closely related to me, genetically speaking, than Elizabeth Howe, even though Elizabeth Howe and I have the same last name. And I had [00:12:00] zero idea, no idea whatsoever, and I’d written an entire novel about this person and found that there she was, just hanging out, waiting for me. So I definitely have gotten more superstitious the longer I’ve worked on witchcraft.

    Josh Hutchinson: That’s a very strange thing to have happen to you. But it turns out that Deliverance Dane is actually my like eighth or ninth great grand aunt, and Elizabeth Jackson Howe is also an aunt, and Deliverance Dane, in her confession, says that she worked with Mary Osgood, and that’s my grandmother. I connected to a lot of the people you’re connected to.

    Katherine Howe: So we’re cousins, Josh.

    Josh Hutchinson: And Sarah’s my cousin through Mary Esty.

    Katherine Howe: Wow.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah. It’s a small world when you get back to those little towns back there.

    Katherine Howe: Yes. It really is, for sure. It’s still pretty far back there. It’s a long time ago. It was very funny. I once did a book event, and someone came out to me very emotional, [00:13:00] and they were, turns out, a descendant of a judge from the Salem trials. And this person wanted very much to personally apologize to me. And I was like, ” no, it’s really, it’s okay”. Like he’s, this is not something that you need to feel badly about. This is, everything’s fine, cool’s fine. But it is interesting to me how close people can feel to people who are living in such a distant time period.

    Josh Hutchinson: We definitely feel connected to our ancestors, and we talk to a lot of descendants of which trial victims, and they have an emotional bond with those ancestors, but that was so long ago. Did you get interested in Salem because of your connection with Howe and Proctor?

    Katherine Howe: Partly. I went to graduate school for American and New England studies, which is like interdisciplinary American history. And I actually came to it from an art history [00:14:00] background. I have a background in visual culture, and it’s a where for grad school visual culture and also material culture, which is to say, stuff, objects. On a whim, my husband and I moved to Marblehead, Massachusetts, which is a small town on the water close to modern-day Salem.

    Katherine Howe: We’re having this conversation in October, and there was just an article on Boston Globe about how like a hundred thousand people came to Salem for Halloween and running streets. Salem is a town of 40,000 people. I can’t even wrap my head around how many people they cramming in this season. And a lot of people come to Salem for Halloween. It’s like Halloween Central, and understandably.

    Katherine Howe: But it was interesting to me while I was living in Marblehead and I was studying history. And I was living in a house that was built in 1705. And so one thing I have to say is people associate me so closely with Salem, because I’ve written so much Salem fiction. I grew up in [00:15:00] Houston, Texas. Okay. So the oldest building extant in Houston, Texas is a wine bar that was originally built as a bakery, and it’s from 1856. So the oldest building in the entire city that I grew up in is six years younger than the new edition of the house that I was living in in Marblehead, Massachusetts. Earlier, when I was talking about having a sense of being home but being a stranger there. I brought my new south eyes to this incredibly old environment, because Marblehead has the biggest collection of century houses in the entire country. They even have more than Colonial Williamsburg, for instance, except that in Marblehead, the houses have been continually occupied.

    Katherine Howe: On the second floor of the house was an apartment, but the house had been a single-family house, been carved into apartments. Pine floors were like foot wide, and the ceilings were incredibly low. Like, you couldn’t stretch your arms over your head, cuz [00:16:00] the ceilings were so low. And this is actually when I learned for the first time, talking material culture, that bed headboards actually have a function. They’re not just decorative. And I discovered this, because we were so broke in grad school that we would turn the heat down as far as we could manage.

    Katherine Howe: And so the room that we used as our bedroom, ice would form on the inside of the windows, because it was so cold, and we were so broke. And so when we were first living there, we had this futon I’d brought with me from Texas, of course. And there was no headboard on the futon. And so we were freezing, just like having your head up by this wall with ice on the window. We were freezing cold. And it wasn’t until we got like a bed with a headboard, we like, “oh, this is a lot warmer. This is great.” We just only then did I discover that a headboard really is important, at least if you’re living in New England.

    Katherine Howe: And in this room, the bedroom that we had was tucked under the eaves of the lean-to part of a house. So if you’re familiar with colonial architecture, houses tended to be built in stages. You’d have room here and a [00:17:00] room here, and you have maybe you’d add a second floor and you might add a lean-to in the back to add some extra space. So we were in what had been the lean-to, and there was a little door that went into the back stair, and over the back stair, there was this little horseshoe-shaped charm over the back door that had been painted over. And of course, horseshoes are something that I think all over the country, we all recognize what they mean, and they mean that they’re there for luck or for protection. And you see this all over the place. This is a piece of folk magic belief that is incredibly widespread, such that we don’t even really notice it, as evidenced by the fact that you can buy horseshoe necklaces at Tiffany’s, wherever. We don’t even think about it anymore. But it was interesting to me to see this little remnant piece of magic. It wasn’t a real horseshoe. It was clearly there. It was tiny. It was a charm. It had been made as a charm, sold as a charm.

    Katherine Howe: And so then I started looking around and noticing horseshoes wherever I went. And it got me thinking [00:18:00] between the fact that there was this little remnant magic shred, that there was that and also the fact that I was in this physical space that people had been moving through, who had been present when the trials were happening. Like we were only one town over from Salem, and, of course, when the trials were happening, people were traveling from towns all over the place to come and see, because it was a huge spectacle. People were talking about it.

    Katherine Howe: So there was one day when I was sitting and thinking, like, “someone’s foot has been on this board, this actual board under my hand. The same foot was standing and watching what was going on.” And something about that tangibility or that proximate tangibility was really moving to me, and it got me thinking about the humanity of people who were living through that very strange moment in time, cuz I feel like much of the time their humanity is elided by our presentist biases or what have you. I feel like in [00:19:00] highly fantasy versions of witchcraft, the humanity of the people in the past is elided, and in, certainly in Arthur Miller, the actual humanity of people is alighted.

    Katherine Howe: I started thinking about what became the story in Physick Book from that perspective, from like occupying this very weird, specific physical space as a stranger and trying to think about what it meant to be in that space and like how it felt to be in this space, over this incredible span of years, and how, in one sense, the early modern period is this incredibly alien and remote time. Their understanding of how reality worked is very different from our understanding of how reality works. But at the same time, there are certain common elements of common humanity that persist, like lying in bed and being freezing cold, unless you have a headboard at your head, and so a lot of my fiction, my desire to write fiction came [00:20:00] from thinking about these common points of humanity across really wide, gaping spans of time.

    Josh Hutchinson: Can you give us a little background on what the situation was in Massachusetts Bay, when the witch trials started?

    Katherine Howe: A few things were happening. A question that I get a lot is, what is the proximate cause o f the Salem Witch crisis, what caused it? And the thing that I think is interesting about that question is that it suggests that it would be so much easier if there were just one cause, if we could just point to the thing, and be like, “oh, that’s the thing.”

    Katherine Howe: When we were corresponding, Josh, you mentioned the ergot hypothesis, that back in the seventies, somebody floated the idea that maybe all the afflicted girls had eaten moldy bread and were suffering from ergotism, and they were all tripping outta their mind. And that hypothesis was actually dismissed, I think, six months after it was first floated. But it still bubbles up periodically in [00:21:00] documentaries and popular discourses about Salem, because, and I think the reason that it doesn’t go away is because it’s so simple. It’s so tidy to be like, “okay, that’s the thing.”

    Katherine Howe: And the truth of the matter is there isn’t one thing. The way that I sometimes talk about it is that it’s like a Venn diagram, and Salem is the point of the intersection of all the overlapping circles.

    Katherine Howe: So one overlapping circle is the very specific kind of religion that everyone in Salem adhered to. It was a world view that did not hold that there was anything outside of Christianity. So, for instance, the indigenous population that was already living in Massachusetts at that time, by virtue of not being adherents of Christianity in their very specific puritan worldview, that which is not Christian is by definition devilish, and it was actually Mary Beth Norton who’s made the point that a lot of the language that the [00:22:00] people at Salem use to describe the devil is language that is used to describe indigenous people. So, one big Venn diagram circle is the specific religious and cultural moment that they’re living in.

    Katherine Howe: Another diagram circle that we could point to is the weather, that the first panicky behavior that erupts with Betty Parris and with Abigail Williams, it starts in January, January, super cold in Massachusetts, cold, dark. The sun sets at 4:30 in the afternoon. And I’m not exaggerating, like it is dark AF. And and that’s true in the 17th century, as it’s today. And also in 1690s, North America was in miniature ice age. It was even colder and more bitter than it is now in Massachusetts.

    Katherine Howe: Another piece is pretty relentless class and gender context. The girls who first experienced symptoms that they describe as [00:23:00] fits are Betty Parris, daughter of Samuel Parris, who’s the unpopular minister in Salem Village, Abigail Williams, who’s his 11-year-old, she’s described as being his niece, although that had a different meaning for them than it does for us today, but she was bound out to service.

    Katherine Howe: So can you imagine living in a culture where when you can’t afford to feed your 11-year-old, you just give her to somebody to live with, for her to work for them? You just give her away. And so Abigail was this lonely, impoverished, starving, freezing child whose job it was to obey everyone all the time.

    Katherine Howe: Oftentimes, I think with great sympathy about Abigail Williams, poor Abigail, who, by the way, in Arthur Miller is turned into a 17-year-old temptress. She’s a child. She’s a child. And if you look at the descriptions of her behavior that are described as her being in her fits, a lot of her behavior sounds to me like playing, [00:24:00] like running around in circles and flapping your arms and saying, ” whish” and saying that you’re gonna fly at the chimney.

    Katherine Howe: Is that devilish possession, or is it an 11 year old girl being silly? And I feel like that is a, that is something that’s worth thinking about. So there’s the kind of class and gender politics, that’s another big.

    Katherine Howe: So there are a number of different aspects, but you were asking about the politics and the charter. So this is another pretty big circle. So, typically in the early modern period in the colonies, if someone was accused as a witch, they would be accused and have a trial, and if they were found guilty, by the way, it’s hard to find people guilty. They actually had a pretty high bar for for evidence at that time. Believe it or not, you could be tried and found guilty, and if you’re found guilty, you could be put to death, and that could happen within a matter of weeks. Salem, the panic begins in January, the first hangings aren’t until June. That’s like a huge long span of time. And the reason for that long span of time is because the Glorious Revolution was unfolding.

    Katherine Howe: Back in England at that [00:25:00] time, Massachusetts Charter had expired, so they didn’t have the legal wherewithal to hold a trial. That’s why the Salem trial trials are conducted by a special Court of Oyer and Terminer. They basically had to convene like a special tribunal to deal with this problem that had come together. In fact, there’s some historians who wondered if the Court of Oyer and Terminer didn’t just deal with witchcraft. They were supposed to deal with all the rest of the backlog. But we just don’t know what that backlog was, cause the records of the witch trials are what have survived.

    Katherine Howe: And then there’s another piece of the Venn diagram, and we have to consider it. At the very beginning, the very first person who’s accused as a witch is accused by Abigail and Betty and she’s the only person who has less social and cultural power than they do. And they accuse Tituba or Titube Indian, who is an enslaved woman in the Parris household.

    Katherine Howe: So she’s basically the only person who has less ability to protect herself than these children themselves do. And so Tituba’s accused. She [00:26:00] has two confessions, and there’s some evidence that she is beaten in between the two confessions. And in one of the confessions, Tituba introduces the idea of a conspiracy. She says that there is a group of witches at work in Salem Village. She doesn’t know who they are or how many.

    Katherine Howe: And so at one point early on, there’s actually a sermon is preached in Salem Village that I’m gonna mangle the title, but it’s something along the lines of “Christ Knows How Many Devils There Are.” And so you have this idea of an unknown number of conspirators, who must be discovered. And when you have this undefined, invisible threat and also no legal relief, there’s no like pressure valve that this tension could be released by, because of the like, unfortunate timing of the expiration of the charter.

    Katherine Howe: So you bring [00:27:00] all of these circles in the Venn diagram together, and that is why Salem gets as big as it does. And by the time Salem was over and done, 19 people were put to death and hundreds had been accused, hundreds in a period of time when a given town would only have a couple thousand people.

    Josh Hutchinson: That was a great, thorough explanation of how it took all these different factors to create the situation. It wasn’t something, a single bullet theory, that you can put to rest.

    Katherine Howe: But I think one reason that, that we keep craving for simplicity is because with a simple explanation for why than it’s easier to consign, to history. It’d be so much more encouraging or it’d be such a relief to be able to say, “Oh, it was air got poisoning. No big deal. That’s all.” But like the fact that it, what really was at stake was this intersection of circumstances and that everyone who was a participant in [00:28:00] Salem pretty much believed that they were doing the right thing. Not only the right thing, but the necessary thing to save their community. That to me is also a moving but also terrifying thing to remember and to realize.

    Katherine Howe: Because certainly we all, we’ve all lived through moments where we are convinced that we’re doing the right thing, only to see ourselves perpetuating horrors, and that is I think that’s one of the reasons we as a culture are never really able to let go of Salem.

    Sarah Jack: You said, ” as a culture, we’re never able to let go of Salem.” Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote, ” shall we never get rid of this past? It lies upon the present like a giant’s dead body.” I’m wondering what you think you would write now about that.

    Katherine Howe: Hawthorne in particular is someone who, like he personally, so felt the weight of Salem’s past in a very personal way, because he was a descendant of Judge Hathorne, obviously. And because he was living there himself, and for many [00:29:00] generations, in fact, much during much of the time period when Hawthorne was living in Salem, the witch trials were not discussed in polite society. This was true into the 20th century, actually. They were not discussed. It was not something that was brought up. It’s certainly something my family never talked about until this is something that my, my aunt uncovered. There was a sense of embarrassment attached to it, I think.

    Katherine Howe: But I’m also intrigued by the fact that when Hawthorne has tried to grapple with it, and he has tried to grapple with it, he took the line from he, he knew what had happened. Like he took a line from Sarah Good and put it in the mouth of Matthew Maule, in The House of the Seven Gables.

    Katherine Howe: Was it Hawthorne who grumbled about “damn scribbling women?” I think it was. I think it was. And so this is me tweaking his nose a little bit, but Sarah Good. Sarah Good was a beggar. Okay. She was destitute. She was one of the first people accused, because she was in no position to defend herself. She was thrown into jail. She has a baby on her and like [00:30:00] toddler, essentially with her, the baby dies while they’re in jail. The toddler, whose name is Dorothy, ends up losing her mind and has to be like supported by the town after the trials are all over. So like this person is in absolutely dire straits and is and suffers mightily at the hands of the community where she lives and who’s supposed to be helping them.

    Katherine Howe: And when she’s on the scaffold, she says the most badass thing anyone has ever said in history of time, my unbiased opinion. She says, “I’m no more than a witch than you are a wizard, and if you take away my life, God will give you blood to drink.” And I wish I had that kind of wherewithal, because who has that kind of wherewithal under in those circumstances?

    Katherine Howe: And so Hawthorne takes this line, Hawthorne knows it’s happened, and he puts this line in a guy, in a guy’s mouth. I understand that he’s writing in the 19th century. I get it. But at the same time, I think it’s impossible to look [00:31:00] at Salem and not consider gender politics in place. The fact that virtually everyone who’s accused and put to death was a woman. Any man who was accused cuz he’s associated with a woman who was already accused. Giles Corey was crushed to death between stones. He’s accused cuz his wife, Martha’s accused first, but also the accusers are initially children, but then also women. So there’s a really intense gender politics in place here.

    Katherine Howe: So your question was, the past lying with the weight of the giant and what would Hawthorne say today? And I’m actually curious what Hawthorne would say about it today. I think he would sympathize with, or maybe be aggravated by the fact that we’re still having the conversation that he was having a hundred and fifty years ago. But at the same time, I feel like we’re talking about different things from what he was concerned. And and also I think he would be really annoyed because I write novels. I’m a woman.

    Sarah Jack: I love [00:32:00] that you brought up that he took Sarah’s words and gave them to a man, because it just dawned on me very recently that Ann Putnam didn’t read her own apology. I just assumed, and I think that possibly other descendants, we read that, we think I don’t know what we really think about it. We’re evaluating what it says anyways, but we’re doing that with her voice in our head, and no, it was not.

    Katherine Howe: One thing that, that continues to interest me, as a history person, about Salem is that it’s one of the rare instances when regular people are at the center of the store. So much of history, especially the further you go into the past, the vast majority of people who’ve been alive in history of ever, have left no record of themselves. They weren’t literate, they weren’t of sufficient note to have their burial place noted, [00:33:00] and so much of history, even academic history, as it’s gotten more serious about excavating stories, just by the nature of the way that archives come to exist, there’s still going to be a bias towards power.

    Katherine Howe: There’s gonna be a bias towards privilege and a bias towards power, and, when it comes to Salem, that is one of the rare instances where the bias towards power falls away, because the people who are at the center of the drama are regular people, and where historians have put the work in to try to excavate what is able to be excavated of these lives that otherwise would’ve been invisible to us.

    Katherine Howe: Would we have known Abigail Williams ever existed, if she hadn’t been part of the Salem Witch Trials? We would not have? And in fact, even with her central position at the beginning of the panic, we don’t know what happened to her. We don’t know where she went. We don’t know how old she was when she died. Nobody actually knows for sure.

    Katherine Howe: And so particularly talking about people who are not literate, Anne [00:34:00] Putnam had her confession read. If I remember correctly, Anne Putnam wasn’t literate. And so you’re right in saying here’s this apology that she delivered in front of everybody and that it was read on her behalf. To what extent was she the author of her own apology? And it’s impossible to say. It’s impossible to know.

    Katherine Howe: And it’s one of the reasons that you’ve touched on one of my rant buttons, I’m sorry to report, but as a writer of historical fiction, like I have so little patience for historical fiction about kings and queens. I don’t give a damn about kings and queens. Who cares? They get enough attention, they have enough records, they’re all literate, everyone documents every single thing that they do. And I do not give a damn, because history pays them enough attention, and I’m so much more interested in trying to excavate the history of people who would otherwise be forgotten.

    Sarah Jack: I caught that from you reading Conversion, because your [00:35:00] main character, Colleen, she’s getting to give us the firsthand experience like no other afflicted person was able to do.

    Katherine Howe: Thank you for saying that. I confess I haven’t looked at Conversion in kind a long time. You’re making me think I should look at it again, cuz there’s actually a group of high school students who are reading it right now and I’m gonna talk to next week. I should read that book.

    Katherine Howe: But I appreciate you saying that, because I feel like, like one question I sometimes wrestle with as a history person and someone who’s a novelist is what does historical fiction have to offer that nonfiction doesn’t have to offer? Like, why not just write a really good history of something?

    Katherine Howe: And I feel like in many instances, in the cases where a story cannot be recovered, that’s where historical fiction can be a really wonderful intervention. If you can build a credible world with credible material culture, and credible details, and credible politics, and credible ideology, and then [00:36:00] people it with people who are credible people, it is a way of accessing history that otherwise is not extant, where it doesn’t exist.

    Katherine Howe: Is there going to be some imagination involved? Obviously, but it is, I feel like that’s where the opportunity lies. And I realize we’ve gotten off Salem a little ,bit and I apologize, but it’s something that I think about a lot. Like, particularly for some, a story that’s as revisited as often as the Salem story is, what does fiction have to offer? Like why tell a fictional version of this story? I feel like fiction gives you permission to fill in and shade in stories that where there just is no other shading available. And that to me seems like the real area of opportunity for storytelling.

    Josh Hutchinson: I wanted to ask you about the afflicted girls. Do you think it’s plausible that conversion disorder could [00:37:00] explain some of the fits?

    Katherine Howe: Yes and no. I’ll explain that hedge of an answer. For one thing I find it always a little bit tricky to apply contemporary psychoanalytic categories to people in the past. Like on the one hand, I believe very urgently in, the shared humanity of people in the past, but at the same time, like we take as natural so many habits of mind that are actually very historically contingent. The fact that you and I might casually talk about what our dreams mean or what our subconscious motivations might be for something like that is indicative of post-psychoanalytic. And I think it’s tricky to try to access the interior light of people who are living in a different moment, especially a moment like the early [00:38:00] modern in Massachusetts. It’s even hard for a scholar of that time period to really grasp the extent to which Christianity informed every, single aspect of existence.

    Katherine Howe: So for my second novel I was working on. No, it’s Physick Book. I was reading up about alchemy, and like we know about alchemy as this pseudoscientific practice in early modern practice in which someone tries to turn that into gold. Okay, fine. But that’s actually not what it was. It is actually a way of understanding the order of the universe that took as scientific fact the perfectability of the human soul.

    Katherine Howe: There’s this tense layering of religion and materiality and mirroring of structures and images like, like as soon as I would get close to thinking I understood alchemical thought, it would slither out of my grasp. And I would realize this because I’m just [00:39:00] too much of someone born in the 20th century to, to I will never actually really understand that intellectual landscape.

    Katherine Howe: So when you ask can conversion disorder explain the girls’ behavior? Like in a way yes. But in another way I don’t know that we can actually really understand their selfhood, the way that these girls thought about themselves or understood themselves as individuals.

    Katherine Howe: It’s just very different from the way that we think. It’s very different. So that there’s that qualification. With that qualification in place, I would say that, so conversion disorder is where you are under so much stress that your body converts it into physical symptoms. And then mass psychogenic illness is when a group of people experience strange behavior together.

    Katherine Howe: And there are many examples of mass psychogenic illness [00:40:00] or mass psychogenic illness expressions of conversion disorder, and many examples of it across cultures, across time, across continents, across ethnicities. And it very often happens among adolescent girls, for whatever reason. Maybe cause we are conditioned to be more like socially engaged with other people. Who knows? You can try to explain it a number of different ways.

    Katherine Howe: But it’s not only adolescent girls. I think that it is, this is gonna be a controversial thing to say, but like the recent incidences of Havana Syndrome are pretty clearly an example of mass psychogenic illness. Now it’s important to say that mass psychogenic illness is real. It counts as a real thing. It’s not just people like, it’s not all in your head. You know what I mean? Like the fact that it is, that it has its origin in mental disorder doesn’t make it any less real to the body. Conversion disorder is a disorder. It is your body being sick. It’s just that the sickness originates from [00:41:00] inside your own organism. That doesn’t make it count less. You know what I mean?

    Katherine Howe: All of which is to say, did a group of girls start exhibiting strange behavior? Yes. Did it spread from girl to girl on networks of kinship and friendship? It did. But at the same time, their behavior, when you say “fits” today, that has a very specific connotation. And it sounds like a epileptic seizure or something like that to, to us today. If I say, “Oh my gosh, I just saw this person have a fit.” You’d be like, “Oh no.” And you’d imagine that they fell down twitching and foaming at the mouth, but that’s not what they were doing.

    Katherine Howe: What they were doing was behaving out of the ordinary. So like earlier we were talking about Abigail running around flapping her wings and saying, her arms, and saying, “whish, whish, whish.” That is her in her fits. Or like another instance of Abigail in her fits is when she challenges Deodat Lawson to name his text. She like gets up in the middle of church and like mouths off to this very famous divine and rolls her eyes about how boring it’s gonna be when he reads his text. That’s [00:42:00] not her having a fit. That’s her misbehaving.

    Katherine Howe: But her behavior was such a challenge to the gender and economic power structure that was in place while she was living. It was so out of the ordinary that her community could only chalk it up to devilish influence because it was that unimaginable that she would behave this way.

    Katherine Howe: So was there a social illness aspect to the afflicted girl’s behavior? I feel certain, yes. So that, that’s my long and qualified example about or discussion of conversion disorder.

    Josh Hutchinson: Do you think that they were really afraid of witches and that the fear of witches might have also translated?

    Katherine Howe: Sure. Oh, for sure. Yeah. I think the fear was real. I think it is a mistake to either chalk it up as craven opportunism or as naked stupidity or superstition. One of the [00:43:00] things that I think is important, I like to give people the benefit of the doubt who live in the past and that is that like absolutely they were afraid.

    Katherine Howe: Can you imagine, what does it feel like to live in a world where you really, actually, honest to gosh believe that the devil can go walk about on the earth, as a real person and that he can disguise himself as people you know and love and trust? That at any given time, I could be talking to you right now, Josh, and you could be the devil in disguise, and I wouldn’t know it.

    Katherine Howe: That’s a and if you really believe that, you really do believe that, and you actually really believe that hell is a real place that you can go there if you make a mistake. That there is no, this is another like aspect of puritan belief, that like they believed in the elect. The idea that you have no way of saving yourself. That your being saved was only up to God, and you had no control [00:44:00] over it whatsoever. Like what? You couldn’t go to confession. You couldn’t do penance. You could try your best to behave, but it was ultimately just up to God.

    Katherine Howe: What an existentially dreadful way to live your life, to have no certainty. It’s a little, a really hard life, first of all, and to believe that there was such a thing as paradise after death, but to have no idea whether or not you got to go there and that nothing you did made any difference. And that everywhere, at every turn, the devil was waiting to trip you up. Like that would be a difficult and impossible mental landscape to occupy.

    Katherine Howe: So yes, if your question was did they really believe in witchcraft and was that fear, could not fear contribute to their behavior? Like absolutely. What a terrifying way to live, and also what a relief. Like one of the reasons that I think witches [00:45:00] was such a persuasive idea for so many people at that time was wouldn’t it be great if something was going bad in your life, to be able to not try to see it as a sign of God’s Ill favor, but instead to have someone to blame for it? To be like, “it’s not me. I’m not messing up here. Someone’s doing this to me.”

    Katherine Howe: I think that’s also very human, that human feeling. It’s not just bad luck or misfortune or like the luck of the draw, and it’s so much more of a, “no, this person doing something to me. They wish me ill, and that’s why my life is hard.” I think that’s a very human way to be.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah. We talked a little about Anne Putnam, Jr.’s apology earlier, and she still does that in her apology. “The devil made me do it.” And Samuel Sewall does the same thing, like the two big apologies that come about after Salem is over after everything’s done are Ann Putnam’s and [00:46:00] Samuel Sewall’s apology. But Samuel’s apology, too, is weird where he like, first of all, he comes to it. It’s not that he stops believing in witchcraft or stops believing that there is an invisible world. He comes to it after a series of wonders and marbles, including, if I remember correctly, like his house being tilted with stones. Who knows what really happened? And maybe there was like a passing hailstorm is how it took it.

    Katherine Howe: But he comes to it after a series of wonders and marvels, and he comes to believe that the devil tricked them all. That it wasn’t that that the devil wasn’t luring people into witchcraft. Instead, the devil obscured the minds of the people who are supposed to keep the community safe. And but also what a horrifying thing to, to come to believe about yourself. To look back at your actions and think you’re doing the right thing, and think that you are saving your community from the most threatening presence that your imagination can come up with, and instead to conclude that, no, what happened [00:47:00] was that threatening presence tricked you. That you were so weak that you were fooled. Like what a, what a heinous thing to believe about yourself. It’s a very punishing worldview that they subscribe to.

    Josh Hutchinson: Do you see any modern parallels to the Witch hunt?

    Katherine Howe: Sure. A few years ago a historian of witchcraft named John Demos published a book about witch hunting, in which he has a chapter about the 1980s daycare satanism thing that happened, much of which I was only dimly aware of, being a small person in 1980s myself.

    Katherine Howe: But what happened was, a group of people were put on trial, actually put on trial and actually convicted of having you run a daycare center and used the children in satanic rituals. And at the time that it was happening, and this is preposterous, like I, it’s actually just like on the surface of it, I think [00:48:00] preposterous. I think, taken out context, any of us looking at this would say, “this makes, this is ridiculous. Obviously this did not happen.” And at the time that it was unfolding, John Demos saw it unfolding and he was like, “Oh my God, it’s Salem all over again.” Like the same pieces are in place, like the idea of a conspiracy, the idea of trusted people that you cannot trust, the idea of children being at risk.

    Katherine Howe: And I think that you see some of the same hysteria and language. I don’t like using the word hysteria, cuz it’s such a specific word, but you see some of this in like contemporary corners of the conspiracy internet, where I try not to spend any time, but Isn’t that Pizzagate? Isn’t there some like thing not too long ago about worrying a particular pizzeria was like putting kids at risk in this same kind of way? Like you see the same kind of like at any time that someone worries that children are at risk, there will be a lot of open-mindedness about it.

    Katherine Howe: But of course, here’s me getting political. Like, of course, children actually literally are at risk [00:49:00] by, by school shooting, right? Like the one thing that would really keep children really safe in places where they’re supposed to feel safe and trust people around them, is if they restricted access to military assault weapons. That’s my opinion. My opinion is that if we really care about keeping children safe, we take those guns off the street, right, full stop. But feel free to send me hate mail. I can be reached to KatherineHowe.com/contact.

    Sarah Jack: So I think asking the question about are there parallels, we have these modern parallels that are popping into our heads. We have our strong feelings, but what can the understanding of the Colonial Witch trials and those before do to help us with these parallels? Can it help us? Will it help?

    Katherine Howe: I’d like to think that it can. One of the things that I like to say when talking about Salem is that I feel that one of the reasons we can’t let Salem go. As a culture, like we come back to it and we, like we can’t let it go.[00:50:00]

    Katherine Howe: And I feel that the reason that we can’t let it go, among the many reasons, but I think one of the big reasons is that it forces us to confront how fragile our ideals really are. We are an unusual country in that in many respects, we are, notwithstanding those of us who were brought here against our will, which is many of us, but broadly construed, you could argue that we are something of an intentional community.

    Katherine Howe: That the only thing that really holds us together is this set of shared ideals, and that some of our shared ideals include religious freedom. They include a social safety net. That we value people who are different from us, that we value people who are vulnerable. ” Bring us you’re tired, your poor, your huddled masses.” Like that, that arguably this is an ideal that we hold in common. This is an organizing principle of the culture in which we live.

    Katherine Howe: And yet Salem is this instance where everybody, believing they were doing the [00:51:00] absolute right thing, instead put to death, the state put to death 19 people. That, in the course of doing the right thing, the state did the absolute wrong thing, and they also put to death people who were, many of them were vulnerable in their community. People who were more likely to be accused were those who were at the most vulnerable, who were the most out step vulnerable in community. And so I feel like Salem is an instructive moment for that, because here’s this moment where, in the course of being convinced of our total moral authority and correctness, a huge miscarriage of justice took place.

    Katherine Howe: And I think that’s a really difficult thing to reconcile. And I think especially for a country like ours, where also so many of us are brought up to look to the colonial period for our origin, that we’re told, rightly or wrongly, that we are taught to look into the 18th, and to a lesser extent [00:52:00] the 17th century, and see in it the seeds of the country that we would become.

    Katherine Howe: Maybe that’s another way of thinking about it. Like another way of thinking about it, is it more productive to think about what we want the future to look like than it is to try to think about what the past has to tell us? That’s a question. That’s a question that I think is interesting. One, particularly for an intentional community like ours. We have, we get to reinvent ourselves as a country, and we get to decide, and what kind of place do we want to be? Do we want to be the kind of place that protects vulnerable people? Do we want to be the kind of place that protects people who are at risk, who are different from us, who are angry, who are grumpy, who read too many books? I would prefer to live in a place that protects those kinds of people. But we get to choose We choose who we protect.

    Sarah Jack: We can make that choice, and not only is it going to stop suffering here, there are places in this world that are still totally captured by [00:53:00] doing the wrong thing, thinking they’re doing the right thing, witch hunting. This discussion it is about us here, but it’s about us there.

    Sarah Jack: You have referred to time so much. That is such a strong piece of this. Even in Conversion, one of the simple quotes you have says, “any number of things could happen in the time it took to go down the hall.” You like go right to the time thing. And today when you started talking, you talked about time. And I look at the history, I look at us now, how do we all get caught up on this witch-hunting mentality and start looking out for humanity and protecting other?

    Katherine Howe: It’s a hard thing. It’s a really hard thing. And I wish I had easy answers for it. I think simply the act of reflection and awareness is an important one. Stopping to interrogate what our assumptions are.

    Josh Hutchinson: We’ve talked about a lot of heavy things. [00:54:00] I wondered if we could switch and discuss your new book project. What can you tell us about it?

    Katherine Howe: Oh, so many things. So I’m obsessed with pirates, who isn’t? Hopefully, the answer is everyone is obsessed with pirates.

    Katherine Howe: So I have a book coming out in fall, and I think they’re gonna let me keep the title. And you. Okay, Josh, Sarah, you guys have to tell me what you think of the title. You ready? So get comfortable, here it is: A True Account of Hannah Masury’s Sojourn Amongst the Pyrates, Written by Herself. That’s the title. It’s a mouthful.

    Katherine Howe: It starts in Boston in 1726 at a very real an actual pirate trial that really did happen. Like most of my stuff, it’s, it is grounded in actual facts and then becomes what I’m describing as a little bit like Gone Girl meets Treasure Island. And I had so much fun with it, and I’m really excited about it. And it is a little bit of a departure from what I’ve done, but it is about a girl, Hannah Masury, who has to disguise herself in order to escape some pretty heavy circumstances. And she [00:55:00] ends up basically stealing away on what turns out to be a pirate ship. And we have to follow her on her adventures.

    Katherine Howe: And I have so much fun with some basic pirate tropes. There is treasure, there is a parrot. It’s so much fun, and there’s also some, a little bit of romance, and I have the most fun ever.

    Josh Hutchinson: Sounds like a fun one to read.

    Katherine Howe: I really hope so.

    Sarah Jack: I’m so delighted by what I just heard.

    Katherine Howe: That makes me very happy. Makes me very happy. It’s weird because it’s one of the, it’s probably the most violent book I’ve written. If y’all have read my stuff, then you know I’m a teensy bit squeemish and shy away from. So there’s some violence in this book, but what’s strange about it is, I didn’t invent any of it. It is actually all from historical record. I take no responsibility whatsoever for any of the stuff that happens in this book, because it all ripped from the headlines. It all really happened.

    Josh Hutchinson: And was Hannah herself based on a real [00:56:00] person?

    Katherine Howe: Hannah is based on a couple of people. She’s inspired in part by real accounts of Anne Bonny and Mary Read, who are two working-class women, who ended up disguising themselves as men and going raiding in Jamaica at the end of the 17th century. They were real people ,and there was a real Hannah Masury ,who I talk about a little bit in the author’s note of the book. She was a 19th-century person, and she ended up, I was inspired when I came across her. She was the wife of a ship captain. She was married to a ship captain, and she ended up putting down a mutiny by herself, armed only with a pistol, in the Pacific Ocean.

    Katherine Howe: And so I read about her, and she didn’t have any children, and I was like, “oh my gosh, I am obsessed with you.” And so I decided to name my awesome pirate after her. Hannah, Hannah comes from a couple of different sources, but I really like her as a person. She’s a tough character .

    Josh Hutchinson: Sounds like it. You said that it’s set [00:57:00] around a pirate trial in Boston?

    Katherine Howe: Yeah, it starts, the action starts in Boston in 1726, and in 1726, it’s the end of the golden age of piracy. It’s actually funny that the Salem period, like the witch craze, the end of the witch craze and golden age of piracy are at the same time period, which I think is interesting. And a guy named William Fly was tried as a pirate, and the person who ministered to him and preached about him was none other than Cotton Mather .

    Katherine Howe: So Cotton Mather by then was this like hugely famous, successful cleric. He was really rich. He was, like, had a very popular ministry and so he had taken it upon himself to crusade against piracy. So he tries to bring William Fly and his compatriots back to God, and he’s there when they’re hanged. William Fly was hanged, and then he was gibbeted. He was, his body was hung in chains on a tiny island in the Boston Harbor Islands and left [00:58:00] there to rot. He was really avid as a warning to other people who might go out on the account, which is a way of describing going, turning pirate.

    Katherine Howe: And so I was fascinated by this. It was only a hundred years later that excursion boats are starting to leave Boston. Like steam boats are going from Boston to Nahant. This is no time all. To think that you could go by Nixes Mate, which is where William Fly was hanged and chained. You could go by there and to see you remnant oft remain dangling there.

    Katherine Howe: So that’s where the action begins at William Fly’s trial, and things even crazier.

    Josh Hutchinson: Sounds like a fun ride. .

    Katherine Howe: I’m excited for it. I’m not sure when it’s coming out. I think it’s gonna be November, 2023. So it’s coming up.

    Josh Hutchinson: Here’s Sarah with an important update on what’s happening now in your world.

    Sarah Jack: Thank you for listening a few minutes longer to hear End Witch Hunts World Advocacy News. How many innocent world citizens [00:59:00] is it okay to accept as suffering from violent brutalization, due to harmful practices related to accusations of harmful witchcraft and ritual attacks? These attacks are happening now to thousands of innocent people, who are not causing supernatural harm but are being punished by their community, as if they are the ultimate explanation.

    Sarah Jack: They are innocent, not dangerous witches. These attacks are happening across countries of Africa and Asia. Please see the show notes for links to read about how some countries have advocacy groups working to intercede. When there is not an answer for unexpected bad luck, unfortunate death, or personal misfortune, blaming others for supernatural malevolence is the actual crime. This witch fear is still causing unfounded, violent attacks against women, children, and sometimes men. Listen and watch for the reports. These attacks are reported on.

    Sarah Jack: The Northern Ireland borough of Larne wants to commemorate [01:00:00] eight Witch trial victims from the Islandmagee Witch Trial that took place on March 31st, 1711. A borough counselor raised questions very recently of whether the eight women and a man who were found guilty of witchcraft were actually innocent. In the trial era, using witchcraft was a covenant with the devil against the victims. When this counselor questioned if it is within the counsel’s capacity to say they were innocent, he’s questioning if the accused were indeed working with the devil himself to cause harm.

    Sarah Jack: Is it within human capacity to not assign witch harm guilt onto others? I want to answer that question right now. Yes, it is within our capacity to stop questioning other people about their status as a supernaturally harmful witch. It is our duty to stop questioning accused witch innocence, past or present. These accused people were not, and today’s accused witches are not, causing the supernatural harm that is feared of them.

    Sarah Jack: [01:01:00] This week, academic research was published that is “a new global data set on contemporary witchcraft beliefs .” It has determined that witchcraft beliefs cut across sociodemographic groups, but are less widespread among the more educated and economically secure. Country-level variation in the prevalence of witchcraft beliefs is systematically linked to a number of cultural, institutional, psychological, and socioeconomic characteristics. Altogether, the resulting data set covers more than 140,000 individuals from 95 countries and territories and 5 continents. Over 40% of all survey respondents claim to believe in witchcraft. Stay tuned for a discussion on this research outcome. Find a link to the report in the show notes.

    Sarah Jack: While we watch and wait, let’s support the victims across the world where innocent people are being targeted by superstitious sphere. Support them by acknowledging and sharing their stories. Please use all your communication channels to be an [01:02:00] intervener and stand with them. The world must stop hunting witches. Please follow our End Witch Hunt movement on Twitter @_endwitchhunts. And visit our website, endwitchhunts.org.

    Josh Hutchinson: Thank you, Sarah, for that eye-opening update.

    Josh Hutchinson: Thank you for listening to Thou Shalt Not Suffer: The Witch Trial Podcast.

     Join us next week for a special Connecticut witch trial victim descendant episode.

    Josh Hutchinson: And join us in our efforts to end modern witch hunts. Go to endwitchhunts.Org.

    Sarah Jack: Subscribe to our podcast wherever you listen.

    Josh Hutchinson: Visit thoushaltnotsuffer.com.

    Sarah Jack: Remember to tell your friends that you love what you’ve been hearing on Thou Shalt Not Suffer, so that they will not miss out.

    Josh Hutchinson: Have a great today and a beautiful tomorrow.

    [01:03:00]

  • Episode 8 Transcript: The Putnams of Salem with Greg Houle

    Josh Hutchinson: [00:00:00] “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” Exodus 22:18. Welcome to another episode of Thou Shalt Not Suffer: The Witch Trial Podcast. I’m Josh Hutchinson.

    Sarah Jack: And I’m Sarah Jack.

    Josh Hutchinson: Today’s guest is Greg Houle, an author currently working on a novel about the Putnams of Salem.

    Sarah Jack: Because you like the show, please share it with your friends, family, and followers.

    Josh Hutchinson: We hope you’re enjoying a wonderful Thanksgiving. Have a slice of Turkey for me.

    Sarah Jack: Share the mashed potatoes.

    Josh Hutchinson: Pass that gravy.

    Sarah Jack: This is a great topic for [00:01:00] Thanksgiving. I’m looking forward to talking to a Putnam of Salem descendant.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yes, and we hope this episode gives you lots of conversation ideas for your Thanksgiving dinner.

    Sarah Jack: Especially if you’ve been having boundary disputes with your friends or family.

    Josh Hutchinson: Make a peace offering, and be sure to watch Planes, Trains, and Automobiles, the best Thanksgiving anything ever made, hands down.

    Sarah Jack: But only after you watched Holly Hunter’s Home for the Holidays.

    Josh Hutchinson: Then get back to your Walking Dead marathon. That’s what you’re really watching. Or House of the Dragon.

    Sarah Jack: And now Josh is gonna tell us some history about the Putnams of Salem.

     The Putnams of Salem Village were instigators of the Witch Hunt. Thomas Putnam and his brother, Edward, were two of the four men who [00:02:00] filed the first complaints against Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba. Thomas went on to make 35 complaints, testify against 17 people, and record 120 depositions, including those of his daughter Ann Putnam, Jr., who was the first villager outside of the parsonage to be afflicted. Later on, she was joined by her mother Ann Putnam, Sr. and their maid, Mercy Lewis, among the ranks of the afflicted. The Putnam family was an important family in the village for three generations. 12 out of the original 25 villagers to sign the church covenant were Putnams, and they ranked among the top taxpayers in the village, along with the Porters.

    Josh Hutchinson: After accusing many people and going through [00:03:00] all her theatrics in the courtroom, Ann Putnam, Jr. did apologize in 1706, specifically to Rebecca Nurse’s family, but also to the whole village, as she joined the church under the new minister, Joseph Green.

    Sarah Jack: Thank you for introducing us to the Putnams of Salem. I cannot wait to get more of these details from Greg.

    Josh Hutchinson: You’re welcome. I’m also looking forward to hearing this family covered in depth. They were so heavily involved, what they did in the witch trials, which was so much. So many Putnams were involved in so many ways.

    Sarah Jack: I’m so happy to welcome Greg Houle, writer of short fiction and author of The Putnams of Salem, coming 2025.

    Greg Houle: So I came into this story, the story of Salem and the Salem witch hysteria like a lot of people do, with a personal family connection to [00:04:00] it. My mother is a Putnam. She is a direct as descendant of Thomas Putnam, Jr., who, along with his oldest daughter Ann, were probably two of the most prolific accusers during the Salem witch hysteria. But yet, despite that connection, I really didn’t have any interest in exploring the story as I was growing up. And in spite of having a really intense, lifelong interest in history, I really didn’t care, and I think part of that was because of the fact that Salem is such a huge story, and it has a life of its own, and it’s become this kind of larger than life almost true crime story.

    Greg Houle: And I think a lot of times what has happened is it’s deflected a lot of the attention away from the important things, the victims, why it happened, how can we prevent it from happening in the future, that [00:05:00] sort of thing. It was always an interesting thing to be connected to, so many of us are.

    Greg Houle: Everything changed in the summer of 2021. And that is that summer, I live in LA now, and my wife and daughter went back east to visit our family, and my wife’s family lives in Boston. And while we were there, we decided, let’s go to Salem. And we went there, I thought, “Okay I really want to connect my daughter to my, her grandmother’s side of the family. I really ought to understand the story better and really dig into it. “And that’s really what I did.

    Greg Houle: And as soon as I did that, I became immediately enamored by what was going on in the heads of someone like Thomas Putnam, Jr. and Ann. So you have someone who’s accusing all of these people, and then you have another one who is said to be afflicted. And I started exploring [00:06:00] that. And this is the part that’s unknowable for a historian. So we all wish we could be inside their heads and understanding what’s going on during that time. I thought the best way to explore it would really be to look at the environment in which they were in, the things that led to Salem and what happened there and then really just use fiction at that point to tell the story, and, of course, no historian would ever use conjecture , but the beauty of fiction is you can do that. And I think what I tried to do initially in this short story and then now to much greater depth in the novel, is really explore that and look at the forces that created this really tragic event.

    Greg Houle: The short story and the novel, at least a tentative title of the novel is The Putnams of Salem. [00:07:00] And there is a sort of subtitle that I’m throwing around. That’s really The Fall of an American Family. Not sure how my family will feel about that, but it’s what we find out in this story.

    Greg Houle: And I think it’s really quite fascinating when you think about all the different forces involved in the world that they were living. One of the major themes of the short story and the novel is really fear and the way in which fear drives a lot of what happens and the various types of fear and various sources of fear, from the fear that’s inherent within the Puritan religion to fear of the native population. In the case of Thomas Putnam, there’s fear of losing your place in society. The sense that throughout history there’s the common case of [00:08:00] the patriarch of a family kind of building something, the second generation making it stronger, and then the third generation messing it up somehow. Thomas Putnam Jr. was the third generation of the Putnams in America, and it really does follow that trajectory. And I think it’s really interesting when you insert this man into these circumstances and you see the way in which it drove him to do some pretty awful things.

    Josh Hutchinson: You’ve touched on it already, but how did you go from where you were doing your research into your family to deciding to write stories and then a novel about them?

    Greg Houle: Yeah, it’s a great question. I, again, a lot of the impetus for this was my 12 year old daughter at the time and really wanting to connect her to this story in a way that I thought was meaningful. For me it was about really trying to get behind any [00:09:00] lore that existed within our family to the actual story, and it’s not always easy to do when you’re dealing with 17th century America. You can’t always get every detail.

    Greg Houle: In my family, there was not a lot of detail. I think there was always the sense of we are connected to this great American story, “great” in quotes, by the way. And isn’t that fascinating? But I think, for me, my interest in history has always been about the fact that it is multi-dimensional and dynamic. I think what tends to happen with history is over time we flatten it out, and it becomes very one dimensional. So the sort of typical story of Salem is that it’s these sort of fundamental crazy puritans who experience something one [00:10:00] day, start accusing women of witchcraft, and then put them to death. And while the basic facts may be true, there’s so much more involved in that story. They lived in a different world than we live in today, obviously, but they still wanted to succeed.

    Greg Houle: They laughed sometimes. They cried. They had fights, and they, wanted to be successful. And I think a lot of times we forget that. And in looking at the story, the part that really fascinated me was thinking about the context of this tragedy within that parameter.

    Greg Houle: And so for me that’s my entry point into this. And so when I really thought about both Thomas and Ann, I kept thinking, ” what must be going on in our heads?” I think a lot of times our simple answer is Thomas [00:11:00] is a devout Puritan, and he believes wholeheartedly that all these people he’s accusing are witches. And isn’t that crazy? But the reality of the fact is that’s probably not true, right? He was very strategic in his efforts. Again, we don’t wanna have too much conjecture here and assume that we know everything that was going on, but, for me, I was fascinated by that.

    Greg Houle: And then you also have Ann, who, in my writing of her, tried to present her as the sort of typical, idealized Puritan girl who’s really trying to do all the right things and failing because of her affliction. We know that her afflictions are probably not a real thing, but they are something, and it’s it’s a sort of interesting juxtaposition between [00:12:00] the two of them. And that was what really fascinated me.

    Josh Hutchinson: For our listeners who aren’t as familiar with the Putnams, can you explain Thomas’s role in the trials?

    Greg Houle: The sort of patriarch of that family was John Putnam, who came over during the great Puritan migration, came over from England probably in the early 1630s. He was one of, not the initial group of settlers that settled Salem, but he was there a few years later. Pretty prominent landowner. But one of the things that the Putnams at least say that they always wanted to do was create this kind of communal society in Salem, where it was a little bit more, ” we’re not worried about individual wealth, we’re gonna just try to bring everyone up.”

    Greg Houle: But again, this was at a time where everyone, where Puritans were much more sanguine about their prospects and in the new [00:13:00] world. And I think by the time we get to the witch hysteria 60 years later, everything, the shine has come off a little bit. But so John was the initial patriarch of the family, and then Thomas Sr. was, of course, Thomas Jr.’s father, and he built their land holdings. They were farmers. He was pretty privileged person, but things were different for him, and they weren’t quite so easy. By the time we get to 1692, Thomas is still doing pretty well, and his family is pretty prominent.

    Greg Houle: He was known as Sergeant Thomas Putnam, because he fought in King Philip’s War, which was, some say, the bloodiest war in colonial American history, where it was, in many ways, almost like a akin to a world war in some respect. [00:14:00] It was fought throughout New England between the colonists and their Native allies and other native communities. I think by the time of the Salem witch hysteria, 1692, Thomas was a much different person than his father and his grandfather.

    Greg Houle: I think that there are a couple of things that, that are going on. One is the realization that the Puritans are not going to have a shining city on the hill like they initially thought. Now, that doesn’t mean that, that they weren’t still trying, or they didn’t still believe that they were superior in many ways. But I think they realized at that point that wasn’t gonna be easy.

    Greg Houle: The relationships that they had with the native populations in New England had really soured to the point where that [00:15:00] had created a lot of fear. You may have talked about the fact that they that Massachusetts did not have a charter at that time, had lost its charter. So there’s a lot of uncertainty there. So I think, the way I portrayed in the novel and the short story, to some extent, is that Thomas is really this fading patriarch but family that is still prominent, but like a lot of people with power, he wants to do whatever it takes to keep that power, and this opportunity arises, and he takes advantage of it.

    Josh Hutchinson: What were some of the things that he did during the witch-hunt that stand out to mark him as a prominent figure?

    Greg Houle: So he accused many people of witchcraft. He also pretty much wrote all of the documents that needed to be submitted to court for Ann, so he was really orchestrating a lot of that. There [00:16:00] was also, as I’m sure you’re aware, quite a rift in the community and had been for generations about who leads the church, and Thomas was very much in favor of the head of the church, Samuel Parris, but others were not. There was a lot of choosing sides there, and that became a big part of it as well.

    Greg Houle: In terms of his actual role, he was there during the very first examinations of the first three witches when they were examined by the magistrates. The first three were Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, and Tituba, who were three kind of outcasts. But he was there and playing a very prominent role. I think that he saw himself as a leader. He was, a military [00:17:00] leader and a fairly wealthy person with land, and I think he saw his role as being someone who should take a prominent role during a time like this. And he certainly did. And I think, certainly, as I explore in the novel, he uses that as an opportunity to really reshape the nature of his relationships.

    Sarah Jack: What you had just said about growing and securing their wealth with that land, I think that was a really big part of the fight, as well as having a stake in what was happening with the church.

    Greg Houle: That’s a great point. I think that another interesting component with Thomas is his father, Thomas Sr., remarried at a very older age, so Thomas had a half brother who ended up inheriting a lot of what he was expecting to inherit. In many [00:18:00] ways, he comes across by 1692 as really just having this series of just one after another of what he would think are tragedies. But again, the thing I kept coming back to and what was fascinating to me was this idea that, you have this privileged person who’s then throwing a fit because he’s not getting his way every time.

    Greg Houle: Maybe I’m projecting something that’s 330 years old to today, but I really, that was the thing that I kept coming back to, and a lot of it is tied up in those land disputes and the endless lawsuits and the just no way to ever solve these problems, either in court or outside of court. And it really brought it to the forefront that you realize that they have a lot of these kind of frivolous and difficult problems that we all deal with [00:19:00] today. And I think, again, going back to what I said earlier, we tend to just have this very one dimensional view that they were this sort of whole community block that just all did, were in lockstep with each other, and it’s just not like that.

     The other thing I explore in the novel and have fun with is their desire to gossip and just really spread these, rumors and innuendo and all of this other stuff. Obviously, a lot of it was part of the driving force of the accusations of witchcraft, but it’s really tied up in the same disputes, those family squabbles. They were a big deal obviously, but they go back generations. When you start digging into it, you realize, you know, what a mess it actually is.

    Sarah Jack: And it sounds like getting to look inside [00:20:00] the Putnam family the way you are doing it with your novel is a way to redeem them.

    Greg Houle: That’s a really great point. I hope so. There’s a lot of redeeming that needs to be done. The one thing that I’ve never really been able to quite put my finger on, and I think it’s really difficult, because we don’t have full knowledge in the historical record, and that sort of thing is what role someone like Thomas really did play. I think, obviously, it’s clear he made a lot of accusations.

    Greg Houle: I’m making a lot of conjecture that was purposeful and political and driven by anger and annoyance and all these other things, but we don’t really know how true that is. And we don’t know if he got caught up with the people on his side of the argument. And so it’s really one of those things where I want to be a little [00:21:00] careful. I certainly don’t pull any punches and protect my family members, but I don’t really know, and I’ve never really been able to pinpoint the role precisely that the Putnams played.

    Greg Houle: And, for me, what’s more interesting actually is to think about the role that Ann played as a 12 year old , because, you imagine a scenario where she is really believing that she has done something wrong, or she, like a lot of Puritans at the time, thinking that they’ve let the devil into their being and into their world. But then there’s a part of me that thinks, “or was she just doing what her father wanted her to do?” so it becomes one of those things where those are the unknowable questions that I think are challenging for us to understand.

    Greg Houle: But you can certainly, looking at the history, looking at [00:22:00] the situation of the Putnam family, you can see where they may have said, “hey, let’s just make this thing happen. Let’s just keep pushing it forward and see what we can do.” And perhaps that was what happened, and that’s what’s so challenging about this, because we never really will know. But part of what’s fun about writing historical fiction is you can then tell the story the way you want to tell it, right?

    Josh Hutchinson: I think the way that you’re telling it is so important, because to understand how witch hunts happen, we need to get into the head of both sides of them. So we need to know the people who were making the accusations, what were they thinking, what was going on in their minds, so we can learn from that, and I think it’s just terrific that you are exploring, getting inside the heads of Thomas and Ann in the way that you [00:23:00] are.

    Greg Houle: Thank you. I think you’re right. That’s the part that is just so fascinating. I think a lot of it, and certainly the work that you’re doing here with the podcast is really touching on this as well, but I think we live in modern times, and I think we can’t help but think about the way that works today, the way, you know, people are exposed to certain media and develop certain beliefs, and then that manifests itself in certain actions. And so I think the whole time that I’ve been working on this, that’s always been in my mind is it’s easy for us in a one dimensional world to say Thomas was just a leader in the community. He was a devout Puritan. He firmly believed that these women were evil, and he just [00:24:00] wanted to cleanse Salem, which, by the way, the novel is a dual narrative between, first person narrative with Thomas and Anne, and he’s basically saying that the whole time, he’s saying, “no, I’m just trying to cleanse our community.”

    Greg Houle: But I think as intelligent people, we know that cannot possibly be the case, that it isn’t just black and white, that there may be an inkling of that there. We don’t want to completely dismiss it, but it’s just too convenient for him not to have taken the opportunity to, essentially, engage in behavior that resulted in the deaths of many needlessly.

    Josh Hutchinson: I like the way you frame it as, in the terms of, dimensions that we look at, history as this one dimensional black and white thing. And I like how you’re getting into [00:25:00] the persons of these complicated people, getting into their minds and their characters to analyze them from a human perspective and make them three dimensional. I think that’s very important to our modern understanding of how we operate today.

    Greg Houle: Yeah, that’s right. I think it’s a really important component anytime we look at history, I think, for anyone, and I’m sure you both feel the same way. Anyone who has real interest in history tends to be interested in the fact that it’s really about people, right? And it’s about decisions they make and then how those decisions affect other decisions. And this kind of long stretch of what occurs. And I think, a lot of times, people think of history as a series of events and things that happen at certain dates. And it really is about taking that three dimensional or [00:26:00] multidimensional view and really trying to understand what was going through the minds of people when these things were happening.

    Greg Houle: I think the probably any legitimate historian listening to me would be very angry, because without actual historical record or information, you can’t extrapolate what is actually happening. But I do think the value of something like historical fiction, in this case, is really trying to use your knowledge and the information you have to make those leaps a little bit and try to understand it.

    Greg Houle: One thing I’ll say about the novel is that I really tried hard to make it plausible. Obviously, I wasn’t privy to what was going on inside of Thomas or Ann’s mind, wasn’t privy to a lot of conversations that they may have had with other people, but the world in which they lived [00:27:00] and the thinking that they had were, it’s legitimate, and I’m trying to create something is realistic in terms of, how they would respond to those things. And I think, when you look today, at similar manifestations of persecution, you really do the same thing.

    Josh Hutchinson: What can you tell us about Ann Jr. And her struggles during all of this?

    Greg Houle: She, very early on, was afflicted, and I’m using the air quotes, and struggled a lot with various manifestations of that affliction. But one thing about Ann that you can tell from what sparse information is available about her, is that she was pretty well liked. And she seemed to, at [00:28:00] least the way I present her is, she was a good girl, I guess you could say, for lack of a better way of putting it, that she tried to live the way Puritan girls were meant to be living.

    Greg Houle: What is very interesting, though, about Ann is in 1706, when she went back to the church in Salem and requested to take communion and become a member of the church. And that was when she essentially apologized, although it was a semi apology.

    Sarah Jack: I think readers would love to hear what she was thinking around that. We have the apology, but I wanna know what she was thinking. I’ve seen so many family researchers or descendants of the accused talk about that, and they have different [00:29:00] perspectives, which I always enjoy reading. Some feel that it was very acceptable, especially based on what her beliefs of the devil’s work in her life would’ve been. Others think it was not really good enough. Getting to hear what was going on in her mind around the apology would be really interesting.

    Greg Houle: I agree. It’s a very rare example for us to hear from someone who was involved so early on being also involved at the end like this. My view is that Ann was a broken woman at that time, and my thinking, and again I wanna preface this by saying, “of course I could be completely wrong here,” but my thinking is that, by that point, everyone knew, of course, that what happened in 1692 was this horrible thing, and she was this last vestige of that. And so [00:30:00] my read of the situation is that she is this outcast, and at the end of the novel, there’s a sort of epilogue where this comes up, and the pastor, Pastor Green at the time, is hesitating and thinking, “do I really wanna let this person back into the church? I worked so hard to try to bring us back together.” And, ultimately, of course, does, because she really has nothing else.

    Greg Houle: Both her parents died the same year, in 1699. She never married. By all accounts, her experience was the kind of thing that basically ruined her life. And by the time 1706 rolls around, she basically just realizes that the only thing she has is the church, and she’ll do anything to be a part of it. So that’s my read. Now, whether or not it is [00:31:00] sincere, I think it’s really hard to speculate about. I think that it’s very plausible that it was not, but it’s also plausible that, there is a way of thinking about it where Ann truly was an innocent victim. Not saying that’s the case, but she may very well have manifested all of these afflictions and challenges and that she was encouraged by her father and others and that by the time they were all gone, she thought it was safe now to beg for mercy and try to live a life where she could be member of the church again.

    Sarah Jack: I had mentioned family researchers and descendants. I’m wondering, are you ready for other Putnam descendants and other descendants to reach out to you about the book you’re writing?

    Greg Houle: You know, I really would love to hear what they have to say. I’m sure I could learn a lot [00:32:00] from those folks. So I really am interested in that. You know, I’m not someone who wants to defend the Putnams or what occurred here. So I’m happy to have those discussions. I think that’s a very dangerous thing, so I would not wanna do that at all, but I would definitely love to hear what others know, and the Putnam family has a very important long legacy in New England, and there’s a lot to be proud of, but this is not one of those events that anyone should be proud of.

    Sarah Jack: One of the things that you can be proud of is that there were seven Putnam that signed Rebecca Nurse’s petition.

    Greg Houle: I think, you know, it speaks to another aspect of the Salem witch hysteria that really fascinates me, is how quickly it seemed to go south, right? The whole collection of events took place in a very short period of time, but it was like [00:33:00] all of a sudden the bottom fell out and everyone realized it was as if they woke up and realized what were we doing? And so that’s something that I’m not really that knowledgeable about, would love to know more about, because I think it’s really like a community of people realizing at that moment that they were on the wrong side of history and saying, “what are we doing? What have we done? How can we get out of it?” And I think, that’s why we see some of this stuff happening so quickly after, and even maybe why we saw Ann petition to, to want to join the church again.

    Josh Hutchinson: I can totally relate to that. I’m a descendant of, among others, Joseph Hutchinson, who was one, along with Thomas Putnam, who complained against the original three suspects, but then later on he changes sides and defends Rebecca nurse. [00:34:00] So I’ve been exploring that a lot in my own mind, how you start off believing in this witchcraft and then at some point you realize you are on the wrong side of history.

    Greg Houle: The one thing I’ll add to that is, when you think of the first three women who were accused, they were clearly outside the norm of late 17th century Puritan society. Tituba is a slave from the West Indies. Sarah Good is essentially homeless, for the most part. Sarah Osborne was always outside of the norms. In the beginning you think, “of course they’re gonna be the ones who were accused.” But it’s interesting as the accusations continue to fly going forward. When you get to someone like Rebecca Nurse, who is not like those folks, and that she was [00:35:00] well respected, it’s almost like the fire burned out of control, and you had a point where maybe people realized, “what are we doing at that point?” I think maybe some of that was what was happening, and that’s where you get people switching sides ,and there are multiple cases of that sort of thing. And I think part of that has to do with the fact that, I don’t know if anyone really expected it to become this kind of inferno that ended up really engulfing the entire community.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah, I think about that too, cuz I think about when I first realized that people were writing testimony and defense of Rebecca and signing some petitions for her, and there were a lot, I remember thinking, “how was this not enough?” And also, [00:36:00] when her verdict was changed on her. I just remember, I’m like, “how could that happen?” And it’s just another tell of how out of control, when a fire takes off, sometimes you just don’t have enough water to put it out right then, and that was definitely happening.

    Greg Houle: Yeah I think in many ways this goes back to the kind of perfect storm that existed, where you have, you know, a community appearance that is moving away from their original purpose, or they know that they’re not as pious as they should be at this point, three generations on, you have fear of, ” what’s gonna happen to our charter? Are we going to remain a colony of England?” And then you have this really burgeoning concern over the native population and the conflicts that were existing there. You have just the [00:37:00] inherent concern that exists within the Puritan religion of, ” am I going to heaven?” This idea of predetermination and that you don’t even really know and it’s all determined. “Am I on God’s path? I don’t know.”

    Greg Houle: And I think it was almost like this perfect storm, where some things happen. Some people who are outcast get accused as. One would expect in a case like this, and then it just took off from there, and I would contend that people like Thomas Putnam were fanning the flames. There were others, as well. But I think that is part of what speaks to this, is that convergence of all of those different things and the kind of fear and concern about the future and what their world was gonna be like.

    Greg Houle: I think, also, this may be a reach, they’re going into a new century soon, and I think there was a [00:38:00] lot of concern about, ” who are we gonna be?” There was, after King Philip’s War, there was a lot of concern that it was so gruesome that, “are we turning into these savages, who we claim they are?” So there’s all kinds of components here, and I think it’s interesting how they all play together.

    Josh Hutchinson: It was a grand conflagration. In previous witch trial cases, you’d have one, maybe two people get accused at a time. And I think that’s what they expected in the beginning, when you had those first three outsiders accused. But then you get things like Tituba’s confession, where she says there’s nine witches, and you have people like Samuel Parris fanning the flames every week in church. And, like you said, a perfect storm of ingredients had to come together for it to continue and to expand the way it [00:39:00] did.

    Greg Houle: Yeah. And I’m glad you brought up Tituba, because I think that was really the linchpin of a lot of this. And that scene is portrayed in the novel, and the way I portray it is they, it’s almost like boiler plate. Sarah Good, Sarah Osborne, of course they’re gonna deny it, but we know they’re witches. And then Tituba comes and says, “yeah, the devil came to me. Yeah, he wanted me to kill these girls. Yes, there was a yellow bird,” and saying all this stuff that they are suddenly thinking, “whoa, wait a minute, we weren’t expecting this.”

    Greg Houle: So I think in many ways her saying the things that she said to the magistrates really helped get the wheels turning in the heads of a lot of people like Thomas Putnam. Again, it’s conjecture, I know, but I think that it’s an interesting concept to think about that, that really helped turn the tide a little [00:40:00] bit and fan the flames further.

    Sarah Jack: And, like you said, there was this uncertainty with the charter. We know there was deceit with the new charter that ended up coming, but the court that was opened that, that was certain, that had procedure. It gave the powerful men power. So you had that piece sliding in when everything else was uncertain.

    Greg Houle: Yeah, that’s a really important point. It was a sense of certainty at a time of great uncertainty. And that helps push the process along. And, also, and maybe we’re gonna touch on this, but the other aspect that really fascinates me is how, the new governor’s wife suddenly gets accused and everything falls apart at that point. So it also is a nice button to the story in the sense that you realize these external forces [00:41:00] are really what is driving this, rather than the Satan, the underworld, these dark forces. It’s endlessly fascinating, but there are all kinds of those markers along the way that you see, where you realize, “okay, this is why this happened, or this is why this didn’t happen, and et cetera.”

    Sarah Jack: Yeah, I’m thinking, when would’ve the devil have got his foot in the door on some of this? It was already full.

    Greg Houle: I don’t know. Yeah. I think again, looking at it from our eyes now with everything we see and just seeing the, maybe some of it, and it’s not, not trying to be political, and the novel is not political in that regard, but I think it’s, we see divisions in our own society and you see how those divisions are further exploited. And so it’s very easy to look back through that lens and [00:42:00] see where that is happening. And I think I was doing a lot of that as I was researching and writing this, this novel.

    Josh Hutchinson: So what does it boil down to? What you are trying to say through your writing on the Putnams?

    Greg Houle: That’s a really great question. For me, the biggest thing that I want to say, I think about the Putnam’s is that it’s the story of this privileged family who was losing its privilege. And in many ways, as that happened, you see what the family did in order to try to retain that power. For me, that’s what I kept coming back to, is that there is this sort of multi-generational, pretty powerful family that is losing its power in [00:43:00] that moment, and the years leading up to the Salem witch hysteria, it’s a fading family. That’s why I said earlier that a good subtitle for the book would be The Fall of an American Family, because I think it really is that kind of story, and so for me it’s about telling that story through this sort of famous American tragedy. And that’s, I think, probably the biggest thing that I want to try to do.

    Sarah Jack: When you talk about their fall, and when one reads about all of their tactics with what was happening with all the families and the boundaries and stuff, they were really put trying to push forward. They were really fighting tooth and nail to not lose footing.

    Greg Houle: That’s something that I really try to explore through various flashbacks and so forth. And the novel is just the [00:44:00] idea that Thomas Jr., In particular, has the weight of the world on his shoulders. His father did so much to try to build it up, and now it’s all on him, and you can feel it slipping away. But he’s very arrogant, and he’s got a lot of hubris, and he just is gonna keep saying that he’s great. And what’s interesting about how it appears during the witch hysteria at Salem is that you see there, you witness the fall, you witness the way in which he was trying to take advantage of this opportunity and failing, ultimately.

    Greg Houle: And that’s what I really enjoyed exploring, even though it is a tragic story within my own family. And of course, again, a lot of this is fiction. I don’t wanna sound like I know everything that went on inside his [00:45:00] head, but I do think that it’s all plausible, and I think, the way the story sort of progresses before and after Salem, you see it, as we already talked about with Ann, you see what happens to her. She fades from history at that point. And that’s, in many ways, a metaphor for the entire family. Now, I don’t mean to say that my Putnam family no longer exists. They’re fine. They’re all over the country, but it’s not the same. So that is what I was trying to tell that story through this major event.

    Josh Hutchinson: What do you hope people take away from your stories and your novel?

    Greg Houle: I think the biggest thing I’d like for them to take away is realize that what we’ve been talking about in terms of the multi-dimensional aspect of history is real. When we think of [00:46:00] the Salem witch hysteria, we often think about it as, “well, there was witchcraft and these, this monolithic group of puritans then went crazy and accused witches and then put them to death,” but the reality, of course, is that there were a lot of things that led up to that and a lot of things that happened after it. And I think for me the biggest takeaway’s for people to see this story as a larger story, as the story of various things occurring at the same time, rather than just this one snapshot of an event.

    Greg Houle: Because, going back to what I said earlier, my feeling with Salem is that it is often almost like a caricature of what we talk about, this idea that this thing happened [00:47:00] and isn’t that crazy? But the reality is it happened for a variety of reasons. And to me the biggest takeaway that someone reading the novel would get would be, “wow, I understand that there are multidimensions to this. And isn’t that an interesting way of thinking of it?

    Sarah Jack: I think right now as a society, there’s a growing number of people who are learning to look at history dimensionally. So many of us were taught it as a snapshot, and I think everyone is ready. Not everyone, I think the amount of people ready to take a deeper look is now, and I think that’s why historical fiction is important, and the history’s important, but I think it’s great timing. I think your book is coming at a great, I know it’s, you still have a little while before it’s released, but that just means more people are gonna be ready to receive it.

    Greg Houle: I think the same is true with podcasts. I think that’s why we’re having a [00:48:00] moment with podcasts. I think that’s why, even when you look at like true crime series and things that really take a deep dive into these stories that were often very flat and one dimensional, I think that is, you’re right that we’re at a time where a lot of people are interested in that, and for me that was really what I was trying to do here is create some dimension to this story. Now, I don’t claim to be the first person ever to do that, many others have, but I think that there needs to be as much of that as possible, in order for people to be able to connect to the elements that we hopefully will learn from and avoid, as we go into the future.

    Josh Hutchinson: I think your writing is so important to help people understand what really happened. I know it is fiction, but it gets people into the right mindset to [00:49:00] start exploring possibilities of what happened and to reflect on what’s happening now. So I highly recommend that everybody read it. How can people access your writing currently?

    Greg Houle: I guess the easiest way is they can visit my website, which is greghoule.info, that’s g r e g h o u l e.info. There are links to some of my writing about the book, and I’ll continue to build that up prior to publication.

    Josh Hutchinson: Thank you. We very much appreciate you and your wisdom, and you’ve gone a long way towards answering the fundamental questions that are behind the podcast. We like to get in every episode part of the how do we hunt witches why do we hunt witches, how can we turn away from hunting witches? And your [00:50:00] answers have been quite elegant, speaking on those questions.

    Greg Houle: Obviously, it was much different, but they had the same sensibilities. They wanted to succeed. They wanted to defeat their enemies, and they wanted to make sure that their kids succeeded. And there were a lot of the same fears that they had that are very familiar to us today.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah. I like to point out that witch hunting in one form or another has been going on as long as humans have been around, because we, though the technology evolves and our beliefs evolve, at the core of us, we still have those same insecurities and fears that you point out.

    Josh Hutchinson: And now Sarah’s here with another update on real-life witch-hunts happening in the present day.

    Sarah Jack: Welcome to this [00:51:00] episodes Witchcraft Fear Victim Advocacy Report, sponsored by End Witch Hunts News. Today’s Thanksgiving 2022 in the United States. I thank you for tuning into our weekly End Witch Hunts News. Thank you to the advocates across the globe standing in the gap. For those who can’t, thank you for being an activist against witchcraft.

    Sarah Jack: On its 47th session, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted a resolution on July 12th, 2021 for the promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economics, social, and cultural rights, including the right to development. Here is what they resolved regarding the situation of the violations and abuses of human rights rooted in harmful practices related to accusations of witchcraft and ritual attacks. It requests the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to organize an expert consultation with states and other relevant stakeholders, including the United Nations [00:52:00] Secretariat and relevant bodies, representatives of subregional and regional organizations, international human rights mechanisms, national human rights institutions, and non-governmental organizations, the result of which will help the office of the High Commissioner to prepare a study on the situation of the violations that abuses of human rights, rooted in harmful practices related to accusations of witchcraft and ritual attacks, as well as stigmatization and to inform further action by existing mechanisms at the United Nations and to submit a report thereon to the Human Rights Council at its 52nd session.

    Sarah Jack: Mr. Volker Turk is the current United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. He took up official functions as high commissioner on October 17th, 2022. His Twitter handle is @ V O L K E R _ T U R K. Let him know you support his taking a suggested action on the [00:53:00] resolution. Let him know people like you stand against these violations and support finding solutions. Thank him for his work and accomplishments.

    Sarah Jack: Next, support the Connecticut Witch Trial Exoneration Project. You can support the project by sharing @_endwitchhunts, CT Witch Hunt, and CT Witch Memorial social media, and especially the news interviews in the first three Thou Shalt Not Suffer Podcast episodes. You can support the project by signing your name on the change.org petition. All these links are in our show episode notes. Go to the links, learn, support, and share.

    Sarah Jack: When the state of Connecticut moves forward with an exoneration for their accused witches, they’re taking state action that stands with the promotion and protection of all human rights. Their exoneration decision is for Connecticut, but it is also for Africa and Asia. Their decision shows where they stand on violations and abuses of human rights, rooted in harmful practices related to accusations of witchcraft and ritual attacks, as [00:54:00] well as stigma.

    Sarah Jack: While we watch and wait, let’s support the victims across the world where innocent people are being targeted by superstitious fear. Support them by acknowledging and sharing their stories. Please use all your communication channels to be an intervener and stand with them. The world must stop hunting witches. Please follow our End Witch Hunt movement on Twitter @_endwitchhunts and visit our website at endwitchhunts.org.

    Josh Hutchinson: Thank you, Sarah.

    Sarah Jack: You’re welcome. Join us next week.

    Josh Hutchinson: Like, subscribe, or follow wherever you get podcasts.

    Sarah Jack: Visit thoushaltnotsuffer.com often.

    Josh Hutchinson: And join our Discord for rousing discussions of the show.

    Sarah Jack: Follow us on social media, links in description.

    Josh Hutchinson: Remember to tell your friends, family, and anybody else you run into about Thou Shalt Not Suffer: The Witch Trial Podcast.

    Sarah Jack: Catch you next time.

    Josh Hutchinson: Have a great today and a beautiful tomorrow.

    [00:55:00]

  • Episode 164 Transcript: Ain’t Slender Man Scary? with Sean and Carrie

    Listen to the episode here.

    Josh Hutchinson: Welcome to The Thing About Witch Hunts. I’m Josh Hutchinson.

    Sarah Jack: I’m Sarah Jack Skellington.

    Josh Hutchinson: So Sarah, quick question. If you saw a very tall man with no face watching you from the edge of the woods, would you run toward him or away from him?

    Sarah Jack: I’ve got a bunch of questions for him, so I am going to run towards him.

    Josh Hutchinson: Well, of course you are.

    Sarah Jack: Does he have tentacles?

    Josh Hutchinson: Oh, he’s got tentacles. All right.

    Sarah Jack: I have questions. I gotta go find him.

    Josh Hutchinson: Ah, it looks like you have company.

    Sarah Jack: I hope so.

    Josh Hutchinson: So we are looking at monsters this month because witches are monsters and we wanna find answers to questions about monsters. What is a monster? Why do we need monsters? And why do we treat humans as monsters? [00:01:00] What does that do for us?

    Sarah Jack: I have questions for all those monsters, too.

    Josh Hutchinson: Today we’re joined by returning guests, fellow podcasters, Sean and Carrie of the amazing podcast, Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie, to talk about the Internet’s most infamous creation?

    Sarah Jack: We’re talking Slender Man, the faceless boogeyman born in the digital age.

    Josh Hutchinson: From creepypasta legend to real world nightmare, we’re exploring how folklore goes viral.

    Sarah Jack: And we end up talking about Salem, because of course we do.

    Josh Hutchinson: We always find our way back to the witch trials.

    Sarah Jack: Four podcasters who love things that go bump in the night.

    Josh Hutchinson: So grab your jack o’lantern and keep it close.

    Sarah Jack: Don’t wander off the path, keep the porch light on, and get cozy for this spooky one.[00:02:00]

    Josh Hutchinson: Let’s get started.

    Sarah Jack: He’s skeptical. She’s spooky. Together, they explore the unknown, unsolved, unbelievable, and just plain weird on their podcast, Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie. With their passion for history and the truth, they bring their different perspectives to today’s episode team up. It’s about to get scary with Sean and Carrie and Josh and Sarrie.

    Sarah Jack: Welcome back to the podcast, Ain’t It Scary with Sean and Carrie?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Thank you so much. Thank you so much for having us. We are getting back in the podcast saddle after a long absence, sothank you so much for helping us do that.

    Josh Hutchinson: Absolutely. We’re really looking forward to talking to you guys again. And of course, as always, lowering the usually very high level of discourse on this show. Just a touch. Just a touch. Yeah. Keeping it lighter. the

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And thank you for having us during the most Ain’t it Scary time of [00:03:00] year, duringspooky season, just as we roll into October here.

    Sarah Jack: I was so excited when we connected and it was a go, so thanks for helping us roll out some fun Halloween talk.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah, and, and with that, I mean, for Halloween we always I mean, just traditionally, it just sort of happened, we always end up talking about urban legends. It’s such a like a spooky campfire time of year, and more and more over the years, I particularly have been really fascinated with like how folklore evolves over time and how folklore exists in our world nowadays. And usually that’s wrapped up in like scary stories. And I think with both of our podcasts we have kind of this mutual interests in the idea of monsters, not necessarily like [00:04:00] crazy creatures from the abyss, but you know, well for, for us sometimes it’s crazy creatures sometimes, sometimes, you know, but, or you know, Jeff the Talking Mongoose.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But really society’s like definition of a monster. What makes a monster? If those defined by society at large really are monstrous, if it’s their actions that define that. And oftentimes, urban legends really explore these, you know, where like fictional and real monsters sort of coexist. And that’s pretty appropriate for the time of year, I think.

    Sarah Jack: I’m so fascinated with how the stories are told.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And how they evolve, too. We thought it would be interesting today to talk about Slender Man, in particular. I think your audience will be familiar with the concept of Slender Man. They might even see a few Easter eggs in one of these screens. I don’t know, Slender Man, may be lurking. May be lurking.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But that [00:05:00] is a story that has evolved from basically a post on an image board to this, to something that I, you know, eventually jumped in a very scary way into, into real life and into, into the news. Yeah. It’s, it’s sort of a case study on internet folklore, which is kind of one of the most popular kinds of, of new age folklore nowadays is because like how, how is everyone connected?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: You know, usually back in the day it was word of mouth or you know, books and things like that. But now with the internet, things move so quickly and you can connect to so many people across such a vast space that these stories really spread and evolve and take on minds of their owns even more than, you know, the urban legends we grew up whispering at summer camp.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah, I was thinking about, you know, hoping to see Bloody Mary in the mirror, but not really wanting to, but you hope, will that image appear? Will the image [00:06:00] appear? And then of course there were not computers for me to go look at scary images yet at that age. When I was that age a hundred years ago.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And I think what’s interesting about those like urban legends that we grew up with and those that maybe, you know, younger people are growing up with now that are really internet-based is that they still kind of function the same way. A lot of them,you know, the, the ones that really stick, the ones that are really, that really are evocative and really grab people. They, they’re often cautionary tales. They’re sort of these like heightened warnings of horrific possibilities lying around every corner. So, you know, we grew up hearing stuff like the man with the hook for a hand. You know, the, the kids are, the teenagers are on Lover’s Lane, and they’re necking in the car and then blah, blah, blah. And a, you know, murderer has escaped an asylum and kills one of [00:07:00] them and leaves a hook in the car and it’s, oh, it’s the guy with the hook for a hand. Now the warning here is obviously like, don’t, don’t be kissing. Don’t be kissing.And, but it, you know, it is kind of influenced by real life, too. There was a real life crime that still hasn’t been solved, the Texarkana Moonlight Murders. Those happened to teenagers on lover’s lanes. They were killed or victimized, and no one ever found who did it. So you know, that’s not something that happened in every town. You know, like every town had the urban legend of like, did you hear about the escaped convict that killed those kids?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But it, you know, it, this cautionary tale sort of melded with a real life crime and sort of, again, took on a life of its own, but it took a lot longer, you know, to snowball back in the day. The Texarkana Moonlight Murders were in the forties, and we were hearing those [00:08:00] iterations of the legends in like the seventies, eighties, nineties. And so, you know, it kind of took a long time to spread and, and sort of define its classic story structure.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But with the internet, things are created and they spread immediately. You know, if they really hit, they become viral. Everyone knows about it eventually.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I also feel like for parents, the internet is a fear or a danger. Yes. Or the, and so one angle of Slender Man to me is a folklore, a modern folklore story to parents of the dangers of your child. What are they looking at on the internet? And I mean, in a way, with the crime that happened, it kind of makes sense. Obviously, this, this, like the, the Lover’s Lane Murders is a very heightened example. This is a very specific example.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: These, these are the Slender Man stabbings. Like, there’s just these, [00:09:00] this one stabbing, but you know, parents can look at that and think like, I knew the internet was a bad place. They, they create these monsters and, and the kids are enraptured by them.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Or, or do you remember Momo? The Yes. Image that was supposedly making kids like unalive themselves? Yes. Yeah. there are, there are things like that all over the place. And, I mean, I, you know, Sean worked in the news, and I feel like you guys covered, you know, this is the new internet thing. Oh, Momo, we, we did cover Momo. Yeah. Like on the local news, because parents were probably calling in, being like, Hey, what’s going on? I heard that this is happening to everyone.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And just like an urban legend, just like with the Lover’s Lane murders or Slender Man, like this is a very centralized situation of, of influence in real life, but people kind of take it and run with.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So these [00:10:00] internet-based urban legends, they’re called creepypasta,and that’s kind of from the, the term copypasta, which was like those emails that you’d get back in the day that was like, copy this and then send it to 10 friends or you’ll have bad luck or whatever. So creepypasta was sort of the internet horror story version of that.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Oh, the, the word “creepypasta.” I, I was reviewing the notes on theSlender Man crime that we’ll get to in a minute. No spoilers. And it struck me that the word creepypasta was, was a big part of these girls’ vocabulary. Yeah. Like, like they’re talking, we’ll, we’ll get into it, but they’re talking about going to a, a mansion in the woods where all of the creepypastas live. Yeah. Like the creepypastas as in like they’re the Universal monsters or something. Yeah. The shared universe, the shared cinematic universe of the creepypastas.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So,yeah, you know, it’s, it’s pretty fascinating how those things take on a life of their own. And [00:11:00] I’m curious how much you guys knew about Slender Man, like when it first started becoming popular, and then did the crime really register with you guys, as well?

    Josh Hutchinson: I don’t think I knew about it until the crime. I wasn’t in the creepypasta world. So,it was a new, exposure for me to see that. Andsince then I’ve, I like the creepypastas, but I don’t like taking them and turning them into real life.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah, for sure.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Agree to agree on.

    Sarah Jack: I was aware of creepypasta, but I wasn’t aware of Slender Man, and my niece was 12 when things happened, and I remember, I think I probably, the first thing Aunt Sarah said was, “you know what’s fantasy, what’s not fantasy, right?” Because it, it was so I think that was one of the real shocking things is [00:12:00] like the, you know, what is in our, actually in our world, what is real in our world?

    Sarah Jack: But I was so fascinated because of how his image, just that the history of him, and I know you might talk about that a little bit, but how he just wasn’t thought of and then he was presented and then the stories were, you know, they just ran with the stories. Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: The visual hasn’t even evolved that much. In those first two Something Awful posts, it didn’t have to, it was so evolved. It’s there. It’s a really good creature design, you know. Well, it’s very Men in Black. We, we did, 1, 1, 1 of our last runsof episodes before we departed for our hiatus was a Hot Moth summer. And we talked about the,you know, you talking about the Moth Man, and we talked about the Men in Black a lot. There is a Slender

    Sarah Jack: Sing it. Sing it. I’ve heard you sing it. Sing it.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: The Will Smith, uh,

    Sarah Jack: Okay. Yay.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It’s, it’s been so [00:13:00] long. I forgot what,I forgot which, I was gonna bust into Will Smith’s Miami, and I was like, I don’t know why we’re doing this, but it’s a jam. Yeah. I mean, there’s something really evocative about the imagery and, and we’ll get to that in a second. And yeah, for me, like 2009 is when this first sort of hit the scene and I was in early college, I was probably the perfect age to like really appreciate creepypasta culture and I was on Tumblr, I was on all that fun stuff, but I, I didn’t take it seriously.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Like, I was old enough to not take it seriously. I was old enough to be like, this is cool. I like reading horror. And it’s cool that everyone’s kind of contri, it’s almost like fan fiction, you know? It’s like this really, like anyone could do it. Anyone could share their work and I think that’s really cool and, and special on. On the creepypasta subreddit, which I was on, from time to time. Um,it was always like. Nobody would say that it was fake. Oh. But you could tell no [00:14:00] sleep was the subreddit, and that was oh or no sleep is great. That was the conceit, was like, yeah. Everyone kind of was role-playing.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: That these stories were real. If you said you were posting a fake story, it would get taken down. Like the rules of the sub were, you had to pretend it was real because you want, people wanted the experience of likecould it be real? Like, yeah, this, it’s almost a role play, right? Like, like clicking through these creepy stories and going, oh, who posted this? Yeah. But even though, but everybody’s participating in a shared, like agreed delusion in that, in that space where they all know it’s fake, but, but you know,maybe a preteen stumbling on the creepypasta wiki doesn’t know that. Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So, you know, they had the, the girls, part of the crime, which again, we’ll get to, you know, they were experiencing this story, after it had evolved and spread for years. So they didn’t have that root of knowing where it came from and knowing it was fictional.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: No, but we’re getting ahead of ourselves. Yes. Should we start with something awful? Well, yeah. So [00:15:00] Something Awful, which is, what happened, but also this forum, it was like a message board forum, a really popular thing in the mid two thousands. and what’s interesting about this is that not, you know, unlike what we were just talking about with like the role play aspect, this forum started a spooky image contest. So it was. Enter your spooky pictures that you create with like a little spooky story. And everyone knows this is fake because it’s like a Photoshop contest.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So no one was going into this thinking, oh, this is like a ghost photo that someone really took, or this is someone’s real experience. It was like, how legit can they make it seem? Like, how interesting can they make the story? So people started to submit to this back in 2009. It was just, you know, one message thread.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Until, I pretty early on, one user named Victor Surge, which is not his real name, submitted what would probably [00:16:00] become the most memorable because that’s what we’re talking about today. So he posted two photos that he created and then it was part of the thing that he created them. And one of them was a black and white photo. So,like a real picture. He had obviously found it somewhere in, you know, stock imagery and, it’s like a group of young teens. They’re walking toward the camera and then there’s this strange, faceless figure just barely visible behind them, which was, you know, photoshopped in, but like, really well done. It’s a, it’s a pretty good edit. Very tall. Long arms. Yeah, tall, long arms. Big, strong guy. Dear. Streaming dentist. Yeah, bald, like faceless.And then below the photo in the post was this quote, “we didn’t want to go, we didn’t want to kill them. But its persistent silence and outstretched arms horrified and comforted us at the same time.”

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And then there was a date, 1983, photographer [00:17:00] unknown, presumed dead. So it’s I love, Ooh, I love photographer presumed dead. Yes, that’s, that’s a chef’s kiss. Dead, like you don’t even know they’re dead.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And then there was a second photo. So again, like a real life, probably a stock image, black and white picture of a little girl on these like ladder steps up to a small slide. And she’s smiling at the camera, you know, like, almost like,her mom’s taking the picture. There’s a few other kids playing around her in like a park or a playground, and then in the shadows, in the far background, there’s again this same strange, tall, faceless figure. And he’s got these like odd, tentacle-looking limbs and he’s standing with a few children around him.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And the photo bears a seal on the top right saying City of Stirling Library’s local studies collection. He’s, he’s reaching down to them, right? He might be holding the kids’ hands or something with his weird tentacles. It’s kind of like he’s beckoning and bringing them in, like, [00:18:00] you know, like attracting them to him.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Any listeners or viewers who aren’t, who think they’re not familiar with these pictures, if you are familiar with what the Slender Man looks like, you probably have seen one of these, because they’re like the most. But if you just Google, or use search engine of your choice, original Slender Man pictures. Yeah. Original Slender Slender Man pictures. These are the two pictures that you’ll find.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And then on the second, there was this backstory, one of the two recovered photographs from the Stirling City Library blaze. So that sounds like something from a Stephen King novel already. Specifically, it is, it is basically ripped off from It, actually. Notable for being taken the day which 14 children vanished and for what is referred to as the Slender Man, so this is the first time that the name is used. Deformity cited as film defects by officials. So this seems to be a reference to, the weird, creepy guy in the background. Fire at library occurred one week later, actual photograph confiscated as evidence. 1986, photographer [00:19:00] Mary Thomas, missing since June 13th, 1986.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So he just posted these pictures. He just posted like a sentence, a little paragraph, and then everyone freaked out. People still were submitting their own things, but everyone was kind of like this Slender Man. Like, this story is cool. Like, I love this guy. People were, were starting to, I love this guy. I love,I love this, the idea of this monster people were submitting their own images based on Slender Man from a few days before.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So it became its own thing within the message board that like the first people to see this sort of latched on immediately. Like, this is a really effective, creepy story and a really effective monster.which is, which, says a lot about how great of an idea it was.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It has to be, you have to be a really good creature [00:20:00] design, a really good, creepy idea, to start in a post that literally acknowledges that it’s fake and then get to a place where there’s widespread belief in the, in, in the thing. And in the post, you know, everyone was still very much aware that it was fake. They were making their own versions of the story, and that’s kind of how it would spread.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It came out of the post. People were sharing the post with other people. People started contributing their own versions of the story and their own imagery and their own lore. And it started out slow because again, this was just, you know, a popular but random message board. It wasn’t like a, you know, it’s not like how social media is today.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But once it really picked up speed, speed, it just kept on going and going and spreading. Yeah. So Surge, who his real name is Eric Knudsen, told Vanity Fair that he wanted to formulate something whose [00:21:00] motivations can barely be comprehended, which caused unease and terror in a general population.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Andit is it, right? It’s Pennywise. Well, that’s always going to be the thing, for kids. it goes back to that cautionary tale idea that, in this case, Slender Man was targeting and victimizing children and, with Stranger Danger being such a thing and such a influence on urban legends and modern day folklore since, I mean, I guess the eighties was like when it really sort of like became a hysteria.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It could kind of be that Slender Man became this modern day boogeyman for kids who, you know, like, Hey, don’t stray too far from the crowd. Don’t be too much of an outsider that monsters could lie in wait and get you.

    Josh Hutchinson: I was just gonna say it kind of, you know, goes back to the [00:22:00] why Hansel and Gretel’s so successful. It’s that children in danger, they’re being lured by somebody, they’re being taken by somebody. And we see that with the witch trials. Anytime a child was put in danger, then they go after the danger like intensely. You know, we had the whole Satanic panic going on in the eighties, too. The parents were just freaking out about this stuff.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Mm-hmm. Yeah. And they never stop. They, they might latch onto a new fear. So one of the most prevalent ones, as Sean said, is the internet, is what could be connecting to kids, what your kids could be looking at when you don’t know. And there is, that’s a not an unfounded fear, right? There’s lot of No, I mean, it’s, it’s very legitimate dangers out there.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. So, you know, it, it all develops and what’s interesting is that I think the adult perspective is just [00:23:00] as involved in the spreading of the story and the formulation of the story as the kids who are consuming it, too. ‘Cause you know, like I was a college kid, I guess I was an adult, but like young adults, like they, they read, you know, spooky stories online because people like reading horror stories, but, you know, they have different perspectives of it, but the adult fears of, of what could happen to your child or a child’s fear of what could happen to them, this, it kind of both combined in this story. It’s also unclear to me in that first flurry of Slender Man posts, and you get into this as the lore, the weird Slender Man lore builds up with the Slender Man proxies. and we’ll get into that. it’s unclear in those first two images whether he’s threatening those children or whether he’s, I mean, the photographers are presumably adults, right? And they go missing. So is it that Slender Man’s weaponizing these children? Is it fear of the children? Well, the 14 children did go missing at the fire. Yeah, ’cause they followed Slender Man. But the [00:24:00] lady who took the picture, she did. Yeah. Yeah. mean, it, it could be he, he is just, he’s just going after everyone.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. He’s just having fun. He’s just, he’s just having a good time.

    Sarah Jack: Why do you think it seems to have stayed as the Slender Man and not Slender Men?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: What a good question. I think it kind of, I mean, There are versions of the legend that have multiple of these creatures, or like, there’s the Slender Woman. Of course people are gonna spin it off, you know, like the Bride of Slender Man. But I think it’s just so much creepier, like a Pennywise the Clown, to have like one monster. It’s the Michael Myers. You can’t get away from him. Like even he’s just one guy. But even so, he’s still gonna get you. And this guy, particularly this guy, I mean, whatever it is, it can’t be reasoned with, he’s got no face. [00:25:00] Like you can’t talk to him. You know? He is, he is just lying in wait, lurking. Mm-hmm. Like coming to get you.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And these original posts, they’re, they’re not saying how, like they’re just saying, these kids vanished. they’re not saying oh, he, he murders them like this, or he does this. His motivations are unclear and you can’t talk to him about his motivations, and you can’t, there, there’s no understanding, there’s no humanity because you can’t, look ’em in the eye or you can’t connect on that level.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So I think the monstrosity of just this, like this unknowable creature again, so many things go back to the fear of the unknown and what’s more unknown than a faceless face. Just something that looks human but isn’t.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I’m trying to figure out what, how the timeline on this works, but now I’m also thinking of the, the Silence from Dr. Who, the [00:26:00] Dr who villain, which are a whole alien race of Slender Mans. But I don’t know if that, those episodes came out after the Slender Man legend, probably, but they also could just be men in black. Yeah. again, and the men in blackreally quick overview. But they’re this, these beings.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And there, there are more than one. So it’s unlike the Slender Man, but it’s, they’re attached to stories of alien abductions and encounters. And these weird guys in suits show up to your house and they’re, they threaten you not to talk. And it, they look human at first, but then it turns out like their faces are weird and they start acting funny.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And again, it’s that thing of they seem like us, but they’re not quite right. Yeah, there’s, and that’s always going to make, like we are, that’s why the uncanny valley is so frightening is because we can look at something and go, but the eyes are not quite human. It’s not real. And that makes [00:27:00] people instinctually very afraid, which is why this was so effective.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: He has the somewhat of a guise of a guy in a suit, but he’s like too lanky. And he is got these tentacles sometimes, and he is got no face. There’s things that are off and that are wrong, and that’s what makes it frightening.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It’s like how movie robots have to look like Johnny Five or they have to be human actors because,something in between is a little too weird. A little too freaky. Yeah. C3 Pocus in between, but Yeah.So Indiana University folklorist Jeff Tolbert noted, “the Slender Man indexes at least two separate intellectual strands, two distinct, but related conceptual frameworks. First, Slender Man is a sign of abject fear, the ultimate other, the final evolution of radical alterity. Second Slender Man subtly references the self-conscious communicative processes that give rise to the tradition itself and are in fact the reason for its continued [00:28:00] existence as an internet icon. Slender Man offers critical commentary on the legend genre by enabling individuals to participate in the creation of a legend through reverse ostension.”

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So basically, there are two really important factors, to this professional folklorist, as to why this was such an evocative story, and it’s because he represents this, this fear of the other, which is something that you guys talk about all the time, is that, you know, why? Why do people ostracize other people?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And why do they turn them into boogeymen is because they’re afraid of them for some reason. They are other, they are different. And that combines with howthe nature of urban legends, and especially internet urban legends, which are just easy to access, like quick to update. You can, you don’t have to wait years for things to like get told through word of mouth. [00:29:00] It’s the participatory nature, and that sort of combined into like this really powerful story that kind of just snowballed and snowballed and snowballed.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And it is the, participatory nature that can also be the scary thing, right? When impressionable minds come across this, this stuff.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah, absolutely. And just like anything on the internet and people are experiencing that now. And, and this is, you know, even this is like dated in a way, like how think this story spread initially. Now it’s like TikTok, it’s conspiracy theories. But it’s, at the end of the day, it’s fear of the unknown. I don’t understand why this thing happened. I need an explanation.We’re making up stories at the end of the day, but they spread, because people need to understand what they don’t understand. And I, and people do, there are, [00:30:00] since we’ve been researching the Slender Man, there have been people who believe that there might be Slender Man out there. And I think a lot of them fall into one of two camps. One is children, who don’t know any better necessarily, and think they see adults talking semi-seriously about something on the internet and think that it must be semi-serious or greater. and then you’ve also got very interestingly, the school of thought around tulpas, Carrie, aroundthought-form energy ghosts. If enough people believe in something, then they will The Secret style manifest it into being somewhere in the world. Yeah, it’s a very old folkloric. I mean, that’s from like old religious and even, certain pagan folklore is, creating something out of pure belief. If you believe something hard enough, you can create something and sometimes that is used for good to, to [00:31:00] manifest to your vision board, but sometimes, according to folklore of all different traditions, that can be used to create like your own little monsters to do your bidding.And it’s at the intersection of like creation and fantasy and real life fear that the Slender Man story eventually led to what was eventually called the Slender Man Stabbing. that is a spoiler. it’s an attempted murder case. We’re gonna spoil that up top because there are children involved here and, it’s good to know that it’s not, it turns out full murder. Yeah, it turns out okay. But yeah, there was an attempted murder. So this was in May 2014, so this is only five years after this, the, the first images were posted. So, you know, we, we were telling the same urban legends for decades. You know, Bloody Mary, the hook hand, you know, aren’t you glad you didn’t turn on the [00:32:00] light like the, the college roommate one, like those had decades and decades to percolate. This had spread so far and wide.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: There were YouTube, web series, there were indie video games by this point, I think, I don’t know if there had been a film yet, but there have been since then. So in only five years, this kind of influenced this major crime. So it’s, it just goes to show how the internet has affected how folklore transmits nowadays.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But in May, 2014, the basic story is that two 12-year-old Wisconsin girls stabbed their friend in the woods. She was also their age. They had fully intended to kill her, and it was meant to appease what they believed to be the real Slender Man, to prove themselves to him. [00:33:00] And,I think it’s hard to believe that 12 year olds at children could be capable of such horror.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: At the same time, it’s also hard to believe that children as old as 12, 12 feels a little too, when you’ve, on the face of it, it feels a little too old for this level of falling into a fantasy. Right. So it’s surprising in both ways. Yeah. Now this is, it was combined with obvious other issues at play, probably melt mental illness, which we’ll we’ll talk about.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But it made it so it seemed like this, to them, this was a reasonable course of action. So the victim, Payton Leutner, she was originally friends with the perpetrators. these were Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier, and Morgan and Payton had been friends since fourth grade. Anissa had been a recent addition to the two at the beginning of sixth grade.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So you have this situation where like there’s [00:34:00] these two best friends forever. And then one girl kind of comes in and she’s kind of close with Morgan, but Payton’s not really like into it, but now they’re a trio, and that’s kind of okay, that’s our friends now.Morgan was always a little odd. Her mother recalled that she wasn’t sad about Bambi’s mother dying in Bambi as an example, but rather she just said, run Bambi, run, get out of there, save yourself.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: The save yourself is pretty, and this like very, very young. This is obviously years and years before this stabbing happened, so, you know, she had some things going on. Mm-hmm. And she was the first of them to really become obsessed with Slender Man. She got really into reading creepypasta online. She found the Slender Man story and she just became obsessed with it. She would draw Slender Man, she would look up art, she would, engage with the stories. And she sort of influenced Anissa [00:35:00] with this.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: This obsession. So they fed off of each other. And again, Payton, who is originally Morgan’s best friend, is getting left behind a little bit and they’re becoming like really, really insular and really interested in this thing together. And Payton’s not really interested in it.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So she naturally becoming more and more ostracized the more they become almost addicted to this story and like experiencing more versions of the story and art and videos and all these things. Well, Carrie, they’re working to become proxies to the Slender Man, right? Yes. Because what these girls believed is that Slender Man lives in a mansion somewhere in the woods, an abandoned mansion, except he lives there with all of the other creepypastas.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: that was an idea. Yes. And it was specifically in Nicolette National Park, which was in Wisconsin. That’s convenient.

    Josh Hutchinson: they are.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yes. Yes.

    Josh Hutchinson: We believe it. That he has a mansion. It’s right back here in the woods.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: [00:36:00] Exactly it, it, which is like a, like a childlike way to, well, you know, if, if he has a secret mansion in the woods, it’s gotta be those woods, ’cause those are the only woods I know. It, it, you know, there is this childlike fantasy to it all that is interjected with this just horror, which is really interesting to see it meld together.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So,in 2014, after a slumber party, the three of the girls headed over to a local park,Morgan and Anissa baited Payton with a game of hide and seek. So again, they’re kids like, this is like the natural, you know, they’re walking to the park after a slumber party. They’re playing hide and seek.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: They pull her deeper and deeper into the woods. And eventually Morgan got on top of Payton, told her, I’m so sorry, and pulled out a knife and began stabbing her. Anissa told Payton to lay down away from the road and be quiet so she’d lose blood slower. And the girls said that they were gonna go get help for her, but just fled.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: [00:37:00] So this poor girl, Payton, her friends have just attacked her, tried to kill her. she is really badly wounded and she’s hoping that they’re going to send help too, because again, there’s this childlike aspect of I can’t believe my friends did this. This can’t be real. Yeah. Why? I don’t know why they did this, but I don’t know why they would say they’re gonna send help if they’re not.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So hopefully, yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Why do you think they wanted to kill her with such a violent act? Or why not just lead her to the mansion with them and then trade her for admittance? Why do you think I, it’s, it is really hard for me to comprehend that violent

    Sarah Jack: Me too, too. that

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I think there’s a sacrificial aspect, especially for Morgan, ’cause she was always so close to Payton. I’m, I don’t know if Anissa was feeling the same sort of intense sacrifice of it all, but there was a development in the Slender Man lore, which, [00:38:00] came years later where you could, and again, there’s a zillion different ways this plays out. But you could, this is a really dark bloody Mary. Yes. You could do a very bloody, do terrible acts and act as his proxy and he would then take you under his wing and trust you. So I think there is a sacrificial aspect of this is my best friend. What could be better to sacrifice to Slender Man than my best friend? Oh, it’s like Thanos. It’s a bit like Thanos. So Slender Man wants to be out in the world and or he wants to have impact on the world. He wants to be doing bad stuff and killing people and being a naughty little boy. but sometimes you don’t want to go out, sometimes you want to eat DoorDash, and that’s where he, they’re DoorDash has the proxies step in, I think is what’s going on.

    Sarah Jack: And then my other question about the proxies is because, I’m thinking always thinking about, witchcraft accusations and just, our, humanity’s idea around [00:39:00] witches. so these proxies, were they ever, could somebody be accused of being a proxy or did people just wanna identify as proxies or were they being identified by other fans?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: That’s fascinating. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of it going that way. I think most of the time, and I think probably where the lore came from was people wanting to be part of the story. And in this case, what’s interesting is, you know, it seems to me that these, the two perpetrators, Morgan and Anissa, they were feeding off of each other, they were playing into each other’s mental illness and obsession with this story. And also they were creating this very intense bond that ostracized this other friend. And also she didn’t struggle with mental illness. She was known as being more well [00:40:00] adjusted. So she, what is interesting is that it’s the reverse of a lot of witch hunts and witch trial cases where the other islike a socially awkward or un doesn’t fit in an outsider. But in this sort of micro group little, yeah, microcosm, this three person group, it’s the two that are, struggling with their mental health, obsessing over this horror monster, and they’re ostracizing the girl that is more well-adjusted, less of an outsider, but to them she has become the outsider. She is the one that needs to be scapegoated and sacrificed.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And they probably are dealing with some social ostracization outside the group. Oh, absolutely. Especially Morgan. Yeah. They both really struggled with friendships in school. Payton and Morgan, it seemed like Payton was making other friends and able to be social and things like that. And maybe Morgan [00:41:00] saw that and was very jealous of that as well, because these were her only friends.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Now didn’t Anissa tell Morgan or the other way around maybe that Slender Man would kill their parents? So there’s also like a, there’s a carrot and a stick angle. Like you can come live in the mansion with me and Michael Myers or whatever, or, I’ll kill your parents. Yeah. So to get that to that in a second, yes. The girls do flee. They go to try and find Slender Man in the woods in his Slender Mansion. Is that what they called it? I, I, it’s good brand. It’s in my mind is that, but I dunno if that’s what they called it. But I colloquially, I think people are like the Slender Mansion.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It’s right there. So they run. Now Payton was miraculously found alive by like a biker, just like a passing person. She was rushed to the hospital, and Morgan and Issa were discovered walking by the highway and detained for questioning. So again, there’s this really childlike aspect of like, there’s not really a plan here.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: How [00:42:00] are you going to get into the deep woods of the, this national park, which I’m sure is massive to two kids who don’t know where they’re going. They’re just wandering by the highway. They just figured Slender Man would swoop in and be like this way, you know?But they were able to do such a horrific act that is, world altering, that almost ended a person’s life, but that there’s no real plan and that is real, really childlike, but then wrapped up in all of this horror. , questioning, Morgan said that they had to do what they did because Anissa had told her that Slender Man would kill their families, so that was from the stand.

    Josh Hutchinson: You know, what struck me watching the HBO documentary, they talked about Morgan and Anissa planning this for like six months to like work out the details of this plan, but then they kind of changed some of the elements [00:43:00] towards the end. Like, they want to kill her at night while she’s sleeping at first, but then they go with this other plan and.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: This was like the third option. I think they, they tried to do something in the bathroom at the park and I don’t know if Anissa couldn’t go through with it. So like they kept on putting it off. Again, it’s the child like, oh, we’ll figure it out. We’ll figure it out.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: it’s fun to, as a kid to like fixate on something and make a little plan or whatever. And I used to do that with like murder mystery parties. Like, that was my thing when I was, in high school or whatever. Like we would plan and we would create the characters and everything and that was so fun. But it was fake and I knew it was fake and it was just for fun. But they were using this as their entertainment as well, because it was their entertainment reading. creepypasta was their entertainment and fixating on it, and obsessing on these stories. And then they just brought it into their lives.

    Sarah Jack: I was just thinking [00:44:00] about, attacking her was power. Like how do children look at that? Like, look for power? Did they feel like they were taking some power, like having power to hurt their friend to serve Slender Man? So then are they like even, they’re adjusting his power because they’re not gonna be victims of his.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I think that was part of it, is that,Morgan especially, who was the one who did the stabbing, she had a flat affect too. I don’t think it, it seemed like it affected her a ton, at least initially, and I think part of it was she was wrapped up in this fantasy that she’s just doing this for this monster. she’s just in a way, part of this monster. she’s, his right hand doing this action for him. And I think it’s a way to remove yourself, as well. It’s [00:45:00] like, well, I’m only doing this for such and such, and for a child it might be a little easier to pull those things apart and be like, this isn’t me, ’cause if you’re already wrapped up in this fantasy, it’s not so hard to remove the blame from yourself. So I think she probably did feel power, but she didn’t feel like she was doing it just for herself or doing it to get one over on Payton. She was doing it to, to, go be with Slender Man.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. that’s what they wanted at the end of the day. Maybe a power dynamic was at play, but they weren’t consciously thinking about it. Super hard. Yeah. I think with what we talked about, how they had been othering her in their three person friendship, I think that was really the expression of it was, this is gonna be the victim because she is the most, unlike the two of us, like the two of us get it. We’re a little, we’re a little more weird. We’re, we’re obsessed with this [00:46:00] story and she’s not like us. And the power there is victimizing her. It’s like they, they felt powerful to make the decision, to make her the victim, to choose her as the sacrifice. But I don’t know if they thought of it as necessarily even against her, you know?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It’s interesting because it seems like it was just very much like,this is what we have to do to meet Slender Man. Yeah. If one of them fully got cold feet and the other one said, I’m so sorry. They weren’t like exci, they weren’t up in an angry blood lust or, excited to, to get to the stabbing.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: They, and they seemed both interested in Slender Man and also fearful. Morgan said that Anissa said that he would kill their families, and she also said that she had been seeing him in her dreams, which I’m sure was frightening for a child. And Anissa said, “from what the creepypasta Wiki said, he targets [00:47:00] children most, so I was really scared knowing Slender Man could easily kill my whole family in three seconds.”

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But here’s where I get stuck on that word creepypasta again, because to me maybe this is the difference of being an adult, but to me, or maybe this is a difference of mental illness for that matter, but for me, the word creepypasta means that the stuff’s fake. It’s fake. that’s an attending like mental tag on the word creepypasta as it, it might have just been a genre, true crime, like horror. It was just the genre that they were looking at. But I think they really played into each other’s fears so much so that, you know,they started believing it through the power of just influencing each other back and forth, back and forth, obsessing about this thing, fixating on it, and then fixating on this plan.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It became more and more real because you had someone else telling you that they believed in, they thought the same things as you. So it’s how a conspiracy theory spreads. It’s, [00:48:00] well, if someone else believes the same thing, I can’t be crazy, because there’s something here.It’s really interesting because again, they’re kids.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So it’s, seeing it through that lens is very different than seeing it through an adult lens. And we talked about the Satanic panic, we talked about Pizzagate and all that stuff. And those are very adult hysterias, based in fears, just like this fears about children and some of them ha resulted in crimes or accusations leveled at people.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: McMartin preschool. Yeah, McMartin, preschool, like very baseless sort of situations at the end of the day, that was legally found. and that those were the adult cases. So it’s interesting that this is like a, again, a microcosm of that.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And Morgan was the one that really went with the proxy thing. She was the one that told Anissa like, this is what we do to be proxies for him and go meet him. It was her that said that they [00:49:00] should kill Payton, because they have to prove themselves to him. So it makes sense that she’s the one, first of all, she’s the one doing the stabbing, but she’s the one making this choice, because she was the one who was the closest to Payton, so maybe she also felt the most jealous of her being more integrated in their young society. She might’ve felt left behind by her in some senses and betrayed by her. And she figured I have this new friend, I need to prove myself to this new friend, as well. We both believed the same thing, so let’s cut out this other person that is not part of our group anymore.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah,I, it just would’ve been better if they just got into like Ed Sheeran or something. Ed Sheeran will never demand stab your friend in the woods, and if he does, that’s not good.

    Josh Hutchinson: If you play him backwards.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: yeah, exactly. Back [00:50:00] masked, ed Shean, it’s can I have some tea?that’s a very pleasant backlash. So after the interrogation, the girls were arrested for first degree attempted homicide.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: The trial began September, 2017, so this is a few years later. Morgan was charged with attempted first degree homicide, ’cause she was the one who perpetrated the stabbing, and Anissa with attempted second degree. Now, because of a get tough on crime initiative in Wisconsin, they were required to be tried as adults. They were not even teenagers during the stabbing and they still were like 14 or 15, yeah, 14 or 15, but they were being tried as adults for attempted murder, and they were both facing life in prison if found guilty. So this kind of, it wasn’t a whim, right?There was planning that went into it, but they didn’t grasp the seriousness of it, for a variety of reasons.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But again, they [00:51:00] were 12. Like,you’re going through puberty, hormones are crazy like. You’re kind of crazy when you’re 12 in a way. Like just taking out any question of underlying, mental illness or anything like that. Like you are, you’re not your most reasonable as a 12, 13-year-old person.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: That’s also a bad,it’s a bad position to put the jury in, because these girls definitely are guilty of attempted murder. Yes.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah.

    Sarah Jack: Oh yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Is, how much did they understand they were doing something wrong?

    Sarah Jack: Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Or how much do you want to, how much, who does it serve to put them in prison for and the max punishment, you know?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So Morgan was eventually diagnosed by court psychiatrist Kenneth Casser, with schizophrenia and oppositional defiant disorder. for schizophrenia, Casser said the patients could lose track of reality in a number of ways, hallucinations, hearing voices, and delusional thought, like believing Slender Man is real.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: During the [00:52:00] trial, another psychologist stated that he felt Anissa was susceptible to delusional disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, and this particularly is a diminished ability to determine what is real and what is not real. He also felt that she had no characteristics, of, psychopathy, or sociopathy, but she was diagnosed with a shared psychotic disorder with Morgan. we talked about this in our show. It’s like a folie a deux, madness of two, where you kind of share delusions so deeply, you egg each other on so much, that you enter into a psychosis with another person, and that,the fact that it’s with another person makes it stronger because you’re going back and forth.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It’s an endless feedback loop of this really damaging thought. It’s what’s probably going on with Betty and Barney Hill or those two ladies who say they went back in time atVersailles. Versailles, yes. Yeah. You say, oh, isn’t this [00:53:00] weird? Isn’t this weird? Isn’t this weird? And then it just goes back and forth. You know what? You’re right. That was Maria Antoinette. Yeah, exactly.And so this idea of this hysteria and shared madness is really prevalent in a lot of stories that both of our podcasts cover. hysteria is often a factor in what leads to Witch trials and the scapegoating of those perceived as others, and this event really was evocative to me of the Salem Witch Trials. Now, of course, it’s the one that I know the best, but the fact of the young girls being the catalyst here, they’re influenced by a variety of factors that are still debated even to today. Wasn’t ergot.

    Josh Hutchinson: No.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: But they’re, they include societal pressures, paranoia. In their cases, the real difficulties of colonial living and being a young girl in the pre-revolutionary era and the, just the dreadful boredom. You don’t have much to [00:54:00] do from childhood to getting married. You’re just getting ready to get married a lot of the time. You’re helping your mom, you’re helping around the house, and then you’re lots of socks to darn, you’re getting, you’re waiting to be a wife and a mother. Um,and that was a really lonely and difficult place to be, I’m sure, as a young woman in the colonial era. So that sort of, in the Salem Witch Trials case, they had these shared stories that they would, go back and forth and participate in. There was a role play element of making their, their little poppets and doing a little spells and things.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. And they whipped each other into a frenzy building on each other’s stories until it did leak out into the real world and had really large implications for their society, with adults as well. So it wasn’t just limited to the children. And that’s how the shared storytelling of the Slender Man in this little [00:55:00] group led to those real life consequences. It’s this shared hysteria that leads to tragedy. I think those girls probably were feeling their power. Yes, I think so.

    Sarah Jack: And like the Salem Witch trial afflictions, that was full of emotion. Did the shared delusion of Anissa and Morgan, I wonder how, it, it seems like there was like this void of emotion.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. And some, some of that could be their particular individual mental states and mental health struggles. Morgan might just have a very flat affect generally. I think part of it is also what they were doing was so involved in this other being, you know, doing things for this other being or through this other being. They could kind of lay blame for this other being. And I think they probably knew they were doing something [00:56:00] wrong,depending on the mental illness factor, but they knew that killing was wrong. She said, I’m sorry. Yes.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Um, but the girls in the Witch trials, I think initially they probably didn’t understand what they were doing was wrong. Eventually, things escalated to such an extent that it was like, oh, people are dying. This is getting serious. But I think they were, they had the fantasy, they thought they were in the right, they thought they were doing what was right in a way. I think.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: They put a baby in prison pretty early. They did. I think by that point they were probably figuring it out. But initially, and again, they have childlike motivations too. They don’t wanna get in trouble, so they have to start blaming other people. And then eventually they’re whipping each other into a frenzy of this is really happening.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And then, they have to keep the ruse going, because again, they could get in [00:57:00] trouble. Like it’s a very childlike thing, but has these really drastic implications in the lives of so many people. And that’s what happened in the Slender Man stabbing, as well.

    Josh Hutchinson: You can see how the girls in the Salem Witch Trials and it seems like these two girls, it, the Slender Man case, like they’re really influenced by what adults are saying, also, because adults invented Slender Man and adults in Salem, were saying, Hey, the devil’s all around you. He’s walking around these woods right now trying to get people so you know, they’re on heightened alert, believing what the adults say, and then the adults are reinforcing them and saying, okay, good job accusing that person.

    Josh Hutchinson: Why don’t you accuse another, we’re gonna, have that person arrested. We’re validating your accusation. So it.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Exactly. If your mom’s telling you the devil’s real and you don’t have a lot of [00:58:00] outside experience in the world to tell you that it’s not real, you’re gonna believe that it’s real. And if your mom is telling you, I don’t want you looking at that Slender Man stuff anymore, it’s not right, then part of you, as a child, might think, maybe there is some, like, why is my mom afraid of him If he’s not real? why doesn’t she want me looking at this? you know it, and yeah, it is eventually, like they are two stories told by adults, two children, and the children take it and really run with it for different reasons, but it’s interesting that they’re, the young women and feeling, I think probably both of them did feel powerless. I think, any 12-year-old girl kind of feels powerless in a way of the changes going on around her with her friend groups, with her microcosm of society, with her body, things that we were, you’re not understanding how you’re feeling from moment to moment. Sometimes you feel [00:59:00] powerless. So you can either take action,in the Salem Witch trials case, or you could,be a proxy to another being and not have to make these decisions for yourself.

    Sarah Jack: I was just thinking one of my favorite, one of my favorite, it’s more than a character, ’cause she was a real person, but Abigail Hobbs, she had the most wildconfession abouther contract with the devil, and I was just thinking, man, how would have Abigail Hobbes, what would’ve her, what would’ve she had to say about Slender Man? What actions would she have taken with Slender Man?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. Yeah. Do you think any of those,obviously those are all coerced confessions to one degree or another in witch trials. Do you think people get into and do you think any of those people got into a place where they were just like, ended up in the delusion with everybody else, or is it [01:00:00] always a case of please stop hitting me, I saw. I’ll tell you whatever you wanna know. I wrote in the book.

    Sarah Jack: Well, I don’t, I mean, Josh, what do you think about Abigail and Slender Man?

    Josh Hutchinson: I think Abigail Hobbs, she confessed, I think because she wanted to, she’s like an outlier. She’s a 15-year-old girl who’s like the wild child of Topsfield, Massachusetts. She like, has a lot of squabbles with her stepmom and she like tells, she’s has the habit of telling people, before the witch trials, like, oh, I know the devil. He’ll come if I call him. Things like that that you shouldn’t be saying at any time in 17th century Massachusetts. But I think that she was like, yeah, I know the devil, what of it. And she felt she had a certain cachet because of it. By the way, I know you have, the trial of George Jacobs up on your wall there.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: We do. Yeah. [01:01:00] So we have, so my parents had, my dad’s an English teacher, and growing up we had the famous portrait of Nathaniel Hawthorne over our fireplace from, he, we got at the House of Seven Gables. He was a, you know, my dad was a big fan, and so when we moved in here, he gave it to us and we were like, this kind of I really like these paintings and we, I think it’s just, I don’t know. I like we, we’ve themed this dining room around Salem, Massachusetts. We have the Witch House on one wall. We have, Hawthorne there, and we have, I just, I always think this and its companion piece actually, the two, those two big witch trials paintings, there’s such, and again, it’s the witch-hunt, the witch trials that I’m most familiar with and most people are, but it is one of my particular interests and I think something about the, the reminder of what we can do to each other when we’re not civil, when we don’t talk, when we don’t try to understand each other. And these are things that I really value is like civil [01:02:00] discourse, empathy, trying to understand each other. That’s really important to me. So that’s why I I like the reminders of in a weird way, it reminds me of, my own like moral hierarchy, I guess. And the importance of critical thinking. Yes, critical thinking, very important, now maybe more than ever, but certainly then too.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah, definitely. When you’re confronted with some of these ideas like that your neighbor is a witch, you should stop and think for a minute on that. Likecould there be another explanation to why my butter soured, or why my pudding split down the middle? Which are things that happened in Witch trials?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Josh, I, you say that, but she looked through the window right when the, right when I took the sip of the sour milk. So I, if you were here, I think you would agree with it. But, they were in such a reduced experience of the world, like children, they, all they had was their religion. All they [01:03:00] knew, most of them was the local area, their neighbors, their hometown. Some of them had been in, in nearby states and had gone through traumas withIndian wars and things like that. But all they knew was their very, comparatively to nowadays they didn’t have the internet, right, but, they’re smaller realities, they’re very insulated communities. And in the Slender Man stabbing it is like a very insulated situation. There is this connectivity to the internet and stuff, but the access ends up just making them more, more obsessed with this one thing and feeding into it on each other. And they don’t have the life experience of an adult. They haven’t traveled, they haven’t met a lot of people. So it’s easier to believe certain things when you don’t have the experience not to.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Also, when you’re forming a personality, when you’re a adolescent and a teenager even, I would say this applies through collagen and [01:04:00] for some people through their twenties, you are looking for things to build that personality around and sometimes you can become obsessive about something, just because there’s not, you haven’t figured out what else you’re really about yet. You’re trying to find the thing. And I think it’s harder for some people than for others, but they must have been talking a lot about Slender Man because when Payton heard the reasoning behind the stabbing, she was just like, that makes sense.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. They would do that basically. I know they were obsessed. I wasn’t really into it, but yeah, that, that makes sense to me why they would think that’s a good thing to do.So yeah. So at the end of the day, Anissa pled guilty, and the jury found her guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, so not insanity, but she’s not fully in charge of her faculties. Morgan accepted a plea deal, wherein she would not go to trial and would leave it up to psychiatrists how long that she would be held in a mental hospital. And then [01:05:00] later she pled guilty, but was found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Anissa received 25 years to life. She had a few years of locked confinement and involuntary treatment at the State Psychiatric Institute. Morgan received the maximum sentence of 40 years to life. She was in three years of locked confinement and involuntary treatment at the Psychiatric Institute. And then eventually Anissa was released in 2021, and Morgan continues to live in a state mental facility.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I think it’s good that they weren’t sent to prison forever. I don’t think that would serve anybody.But I think they just, I don’t. Usually the standards for the insanity defense as it’s called, is whether you know right from wrong is whether you know right from wrong and if you apologize to your victim before you stab them, I think you are blowing that defense outta the water. But I also think they probably just shouldn’t have been tried as adults ’cause they were children both [01:06:00] before and after.

    Sarah Jack: It makes me feel frustrated with the adults. It’s like, are we too lazy to learn how to try children for horrific crimes? Let’s just, follow this template over here, because it’s so bad. Well, they got help, the help that was available.

    Sarah Jack: I can’t even, like you mentioned what it would’ve been like for the jury, when you’re thinking about the judge, but even the medical staff who wanted to see these girls heal and be okay, I can’t imagine what that journey was like for everybody. but I’m, I don’t know, adult trials for children, it just seems like can we do better than that? But also it is, it was a very, she almost died. She could have been dead, and she survived. That survival

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Full recovery, which is good. Yeah. And yeah, so it seems apparent that Morgan and Anissa latched onto this outsider monster, because they [01:07:00] themselves felt like outsiders and then fed into each other’s delusions until they enacted this crime in his name.The real question here, and I think we’re probably like-minded of this, but like,does that make them monsters? Is it this monstrous act, this planning, this monstrous act? Can 12 year olds be monsters? Are they capable of that? Are children capable of that? Their brain isn’t fully developed. Maybe they’re not totally understanding everything they’re doing, but can you still be a monster as a child?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: What about the mental health factor? And then this applies to many people, we’ve talked about many criminals and stuff and not to say anything about mental illness, there, there are factors in a lot of crimes where that is a contribution. Can you be fully a monster if you’re not fully in charge of your mind?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Many of us would probably, I hope, say that only a [01:08:00] monster could coldly stab their best friend and leave them for dead, but can these girls really be defined as that?They are getting, they’ve had years of, of help, one of them’s free out in the world. Oh, no, now, but were they monsters when they did this crime?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: It was a monstrous action. But can you define them as monsters?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah, I don’t think so. I think, it reminds me, going back again to Salem, because I love it so much, even though it was awful. Yeah, exactly.

    Josh Hutchinson: People like to blame the girls for, you know, for the accusations that they made, but there were, Ann Putnam Jr. was 12 years old, Abigail Williams, 11 years old. How much responsibility could they possibly bear, if you were gonna try them for say, false accusations or something, how much responsibility can they actually bear [01:09:00] because of where they are in their mental development.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Exactly, and the adults are the ones giving them the power. if the adults weren’t listening to them, the adults weren’t making the arrests, it wasn’t the girls who were doing the hangings or whatever. It was the adults that gave them the power. So at, at the end of the day, they were the ones that kind of helped it happen.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah, I was just, do you know with the three friends in Wisconsin, was it common for them to be out on their own wandering? Because I know that that’s an age, right ,where I was,at that age, out in the neighborhood. A hundred percent.

    Sarah Jack: But you just, I don’t know. It’s, you hate to think that, they left the house with a weapon. It just is wild to me that they left the house with a weapon.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: I think, the initial thing was [01:10:00] that they were going to the park. I, that’s something I, we would have a slumber party and then we’d walk over to the park and sit on the swings or whatever and whatever. Just hang out for like two hours for doing nothing. I think that was probably what they assumed and what they usually did.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And then it, like when Payton’s being brought further and further into the woods, like even she’s understanding this is strange. So I don’t think that was something that was expected of like, oh, they’re gonna go to the national park. They’re gonna go into like deep into the woods,and I think the girls didn’t really know what they were doing either, ’cause they thought that there was like a mansion in there. Yeah, I think they probably were just going to the park and they took advantage of that trust that their parents put in them, they’re like, oh, they’ve gone to the park a thousand times and this will be like any other time. You’re not gonna expect that someone’s gonna get stabbed by one of the girls, you know?

    Sarah Jack: [01:11:00] Yeah, I, the question on monsters and were they monsters at that point? And just, at what point is a human, a monster? Andthere is so much that plays into bad choices as we’ve learned about these attackers. There was, there were things that weren’t okay within their own minds, but do we need to admit that humanity is capable, that people are just very capable of monstrous acts? Is that important or do we just, is there just like you hit this limit and now you’re not a human, you’re a monster. Are you a human acting like a monster?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. it’s interesting. Because even in, in certain other cases, like John Wayne Gacy, right? A famous serial killer, probably widely considered a monster, very famously had grew [01:12:00] very abused and had traumatic brain injury, head trauma, which is a, another common thing. and I say that as someone who got a really severe concussion playing hockey, so I’m not saying every person with head injuries is a murderer. She has no victims that we know of. Yes.But that is a common factor. and there is a nature versus nurture aspect. A lot of these people, obviously John Wayne Gacy was dealing with a lot of mental trauma from his upbringing and brain trauma, but I think most of us would say that guy was a monster. Is that because he was an adult when he made those decisions? Is that the factor? Are we, do we assign more innocence logically to a 12-year-old?I think when it comes to serial murderers and, when it comes to Gacys and Bundys, I think it’s the repetition of it. No, I think we want to, I think we want to define them as monsters as a way to other them [01:13:00] and put up a wall between, well there’s, but not me. It could never be, I would never do anything like that obviously. ’cause I am a totally different species than that.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Exactly.

    Josh Hutchinson: That’s exactly what I was just thinking. Yeah. Like why do we call people monsters? It’s because we don’t want to think about,are we capable of doing the things that they’re doing? We want to be so different from them and we want an easy explanation, too. We don’t want to think about, well, he had some head trauma and some other trauma in his life and you know, that contributed and then you know this and that.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: There was the, there have been a couple of like scary, sniper guys, but one of them had a, just a brain tumor. And a note on his body, that said, I think there’s something going on in my head. Please cut it open. And there was a big old tumor pressing on his brain. It’s really scary to think that just a physical, something physically going on could turn [01:14:00] you into a monster. And at the end of the day, the girls that perpetrated this crime, they thought they were doing this for this faceless, inhuman creature, but Payton only saw her very human friends at the end of the knife.

    Sarah Jack: Wow.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And she didn’t see a faceless non-human monster. She saw two girls that she grew up with, that she trusted. What would she define as monstrous? Would she blame Slender Man or would she blame the very human girls that, that chose to do this to her, probably the girls.

    Josh Hutchinson: Hopefully.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So, yeah, it’s a very interesting question of what defines a monster, what defines othering, and I think we both found in our shows and the different cases we’ve investigated that there’s a lot of factors and it changes from story to story and even sometimes within a story. Maybe [01:15:00] these girlsdid a monstrous action, but,then there was later context found to those actions and that sort of informs on what happened previously, and, the definitions change. So yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: That holding, these perpetrators at arm’s length or othering them, or breaking down those, barriers a little bit to explore what’s going on under the hood, is all very of a piece of that true crime world that we sometimes swim into. I think that is the fascination of serial killer stories for true crime people is like, we’re all people, but how could they be like me? They, him like me, him like me, how, you know?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: That’s the, that’s the dread of serial killers, I think. For a lot of people. So that’s the Slender Man Stabbing, and that’s the story of Slender Man and how internet folklore kind of turned into this real life horror story. And I think, we’ve seen the conspiracies and things like that [01:16:00] in, in their own way, kind of internet folklore nowadays have also continued doing a lot of the same things.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: So yeah, it’s really about that critical thinking. but, it can be hard if you have other factors at play, sort of, messing with how you are thinking.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Has his suit gotten more suyng over the years? I feel like the tie is more defined now. He definitely has a tie. Sometimes there’s like sexy Slender Man too. Yeah, that guy, that one’s built, we just found a pretty built slender, like I, but he’s not that slender. I mean his, yes. He shouldn’t look like he’s,ripping out bench press. Yeah, for sure.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah. So thank you so much.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Oh, thank you guys. This has been a blast. Great blast.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah. This was

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: like I’ve shaken off the dust and the rest,

    Sarah Jack: Yay.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: and the cobwebs just in time for October. Yeah. I’ll put them in other parts of the house.

    Josh Hutchinson: I’ll hit

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: thanks for [01:17:00] having us and, have an amazing, spooky season. And, yeah, don’t let Slender Man get you, Yeah. and, we’ll look forward to our next collab, guys. Please. please, invite us back and, We can, maybe we can get you into the scary studio sooner rather than later.

    Sarah Jack: that would be really fun. And I have to tell you, I was like, I, you could tell Josh this week, I was like, I hope they bring up men in black. I hope they bring up men in black. I hope I can get ’em to sing. What if I can get ’em to sing it?

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Wasn’t even in So embarrassed. I running down

    Sarah Jack: oh,

    Josh Hutchinson: Surprised you didn’t get jiggy with it.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Yeah. No, I really have, just, enjoyed your episodes so much. Thank you so much. Thank you. we have loved, watching your show grow and develop and the scope develop and also how you guys have helped influence, the sort of real world out outside of podcast stuff. That’s really important and, again, in influencing more critical thought [01:18:00] and interest in history and knowing how history informs what we’re doing now. I think that’s more important now than ever, probably.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: And some, sometimes how some of the stuff isn’t fully left in the past. No, it just, a lot of the times it just recycles and repeats and hopefully we can approach it in a more critical and tempered way. That’s not always the name of the game nowadays, unfortunately.

    Sarah Jack: Yeah.

    Josh Hutchinson: Yeah.

    Ain’t it Scary with Sean and Carrie: Start by not calling people monsters. That’s true.

    Josh Hutchinson: Have a great today and a beautiful tomorrow.